Richardson Sex Crimes Attorney

Richardson straddles a county line — most of the city lies in Dallas County, with a northern edge reaching into Collin County — and for anyone accused of a sex offense here, the first practical question is which of those two systems the case will run through. The larger share of Richardson matters, sex cases among them, are handled in Dallas County: the Richardson Police Department investigates, an arrested person is transferred to the Lew Sterrett Justice Center downtown, and the case is prosecuted in the criminal district courts at the Frank Crowley Courts Building. Along the Telecom Corridor, where technology employers, cleared contractors, and the University of Texas at Dallas define the city, an allegation can jeopardize a career, a clearance, or a degree long before a courtroom weighs in — which is why the earliest, pre-arrest decisions matter most. L and L Law Group is a Frisco firm that defends these cases in the Dallas County courts, and this page covers the two-county split, the offenses and their ranges, the registry, the local courthouse and jail, and the choices that protect an accused person. Reach us at (972) 370-5060.

Peer Recognition

Martindale-Hubbell® 2026 Honors

Independent peer-review ratings recognizing legal ability and ethical standards.

Awards reflect peer-reviewed ratings only. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

The Dallas–Collin Split and Why It Matters First

Richardson is unusual among North Texas suburbs in that a county line runs straight through it. The bulk of the city — downtown, the Telecom Corridor, the University of Texas at Dallas, most residential neighborhoods — lies in Dallas County. A northern strip crosses into Collin County. That boundary is not a trivia point; it decides which prosecutors, which judges, which jail, and which set of local practices will govern a case, so it is the first thing a defense lawyer nails down when a Richardson matter comes in.

For the great majority of Richardson sex allegations, the answer is Dallas County. The case is prosecuted downtown by the Dallas County Criminal District Attorney, heard in the criminal district courts at the Frank Crowley Courts Building, and staged out of the Lew Sterrett jail. A smaller number of cases arising in the Collin County portion of the city route north to McKinney instead, where the Collin County courts and the county detention facility take over. Which county has jurisdiction generally tracks where the alleged offense is said to have occurred, not merely where the accused happens to live — a distinction that occasionally puts a Richardson resident’s case in a courthouse they did not expect. Everything that follows on this page assumes the Dallas County track, because that is where most of Richardson sits and where most of these cases are decided; if your matter is on the Collin County side, our Collin County sex-crimes page covers that system, and the offense law below applies identically either way.

The Offenses and What They Carry

Texas law does not have one “sex crime.” It has a cluster of separate offenses spread across several chapters of the Penal Code, and they range from a Class B misdemeanor to a first-degree felony carrying the harshest range the statutes allow. The single most important early step is pinning down exactly which offense an accusation actually alleges, because the strategy for a misdemeanor and the strategy for a first-degree felony have almost nothing in common. The offenses we most often defend for Richardson clients are below, each linked to a page that goes deeper on elements and defenses.

The two assault statutes sit at the top of the exposure ladder. Sexual assault under Section 22.011 is generally a second-degree felony; aggravated sexual assault under Section 22.021 is a first-degree felony carrying the highest ranges in Texas law, with a 25-year floor when the complainant is a young child. Our dedicated Dallas sexual-assault defense page works through consent, SANE examinations, and DNA in detail. It is worth stressing that even indecent exposure — a misdemeanor — can land a person on the registry and end a career, so no charge in this family, whatever its grade, is minor. The full catalog lives on our sex-crimes practice overview, and the broader Dallas sex-crimes page covers the metro-wide picture.

Frank Crowley and the Path of a Dallas County Case

A Richardson felony sex case on the Dallas County side is prosecuted at the Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 N. Riverfront Boulevard, Dallas 75207, the county’s criminal courthouse just west of downtown along the Trinity. The building houses the criminal district courts that try felonies and the offices of the Dallas County Criminal District Attorney, who prosecutes on behalf of the State. Misdemeanor sex offenses — most indecent-exposure cases, for example — are handled in the county criminal courts, while a purely local Class C or ordinance matter would stay with the Richardson Municipal Court.

Knowing the sequence takes some of the fear out of the process. A Texas felony proceeds by indictment, so before a Richardson sex case can move forward, a Dallas County grand jury must return a true bill; only then is the matter set in one of the criminal district courts. From there it follows a recognizable rhythm — an arraignment or first setting, a series of pretrial announcement dates where the State and the defense report status, motion practice that can include fights over search warrants, the admissibility of statements, and the handling of forensic and outcry evidence, and, if the case does not resolve, a trial before a Dallas County jury. Misdemeanors skip the grand jury and travel a shorter road through the county criminal courts. Our overview of what happens after a Texas arrest walks through each stage, and the county-wide Dallas County sex-crimes page adds detail on how these matters move through the Crowley courts.

Arrest, Lew Sterrett, and Getting Out

When the Richardson Police Department makes an arrest, a felony sex charge is a county matter, so the person is transferred to the Lew Sterrett Justice Center — the Dallas County Jail — at 111 W. Commerce Street, Dallas, the Sheriff-operated complex where county intake happens and where bond is ultimately posted. Richardson may hold someone briefly at its own city facility, but the meaningful booking, the magistrate’s warnings, and the bail hearing take place at Lew Sterrett. This is where the two-county geography bites again: a family that expects a loved one to be “at the Richardson jail” often finds them, a day later, downtown at Lew Sterrett, and knowing to track that hand-off from the start prevents hours of confusion.

Release turns on the magistrate’s bail decision, which comes quickly. Within roughly forty-eight hours the arrested person is brought before a magistrate under Article 15.17, told the charges, and given a bail amount. The number is guided by the factors in Article 17.15 — enough to secure the person’s return without being an instrument of oppression, weighed against the seriousness of the accusation, the person’s ability to pay, community ties, and the safety of the accuser and the public. Bond is posted at the jail by cash, through a licensed surety (a bondsman), or on a personal bond where the court allows one. And in a sex case the magistrate almost always attaches conditions to release — no contact with the accuser, stay-away zones around schools and children’s spaces, sometimes electronic monitoring, and, in online matters, limits on devices and internet use. Those conditions decide whether a person can return to their own home, see their children, or keep the phone their job depends on, and a single violation can revoke the bond and send the person back through intake on a new warrant. A lawyer engaged before that first hearing can press for a workable amount and for conditions no broader than the case honestly requires; our bail and bond requirements and bond conditions pages lay out the mechanics, and we handle bond reduction in Dallas County when an amount or a term needs to be revisited.

The Pre-Charge Window — the Part That Decides Cases

The single most counterintuitive fact about sex cases is that the decisive period often comes before any charge exists. Across Dallas County, and in Richardson specifically, these matters are commonly investigated for weeks or months before anything is filed, and what happens in that quiet stretch frequently matters more than anything a courtroom does later. The blunt takeaway: the time to call a lawyer is the day you learn you are being investigated, not the day you are arrested.

During that window, a person under investigation is usually asked to do one or more things that sound cooperative and each of which can hand the State evidence it would not otherwise have — come to the station and give a recorded “your side” statement, sit for a polygraph “to clear things up,” unlock or surrender a phone or laptop for a “quick look,” or reach out to the accuser to apologize or explain. A lawyer brought in now can decline those requests on the client’s behalf, deal directly with the Richardson detective and with any CPS caseworker, control what is and is not disclosed, and sometimes present information that bears on whether a charge issues at all. Early counsel also heads off the self-inflicted wounds that sink defendants: deleting messages in a panic can spawn a separate tampering charge and reads as consciousness of guilt, and contacting the accuser can manufacture new evidence and fresh counts. If a detective or caseworker has already reached out about a Richardson allegation, that is not a conversation to walk into alone.

The Registry: the Consequence People Underestimate

Ask most people to name the worst part of a sex conviction and they will say prison. For a great many Richardson defendants the honest answer is the registry, which is why it belongs here in the body of the page and not buried in a footnote. Whether a case ends in a registrable conviction often matters more to a person’s future than the exact number of months attached to it.

The framework is Chapter 62 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which names the offenses it treats as “reportable” and fixes how long the duty lasts — ten years past the end of the sentence for some offenses, life for others. What makes the registry so punishing is that it is not paperwork filed and forgotten: the registrant’s name and address sit in a public database, the law restricts where that person can live and work, in-person re-verification is required on a recurring schedule, and the entry surfaces on background checks for as long as the duty runs. For the professionals who fill Richardson’s corporate campuses, that public, permanent visibility can outweigh any period of confinement.

Crucially, the duty is keyed to the specific offense of conviction and how the case ended, not to the alleged conduct in the abstract. The count the State ultimately accepts, and the exact shape of a plea or verdict, can determine whether any registration obligation attaches at all — so steering a case toward a resolution that is not a reportable offense, where the facts and the statute leave that room, can be worth more to a client than trimming months off a sentence. And even an existing duty is not always permanent: Texas permits some registrants to petition for early termination or deregistration, relief our firm pursues. Avoiding, shortening, or later ending the registration obligation is part of the analysis we run from the first meeting.

Child Complainants and the Forensic Interview

When the accuser is a child, a Dallas County case turns early on the forensic interview. Rather than question a child at a police station, investigators arrange a recorded interview with a specially trained forensic interviewer at the county children’s advocacy center, while detectives and Child Protective Services watch from another room. The stated aim is to capture the child’s account once, neutrally and in a developmentally appropriate way, without repeated or leading questioning.

That recording usually becomes the spine of the State’s case, which is precisely why the defense studies it so closely. The questions that matter: how the outcry first surfaced and to whom, whether a custody battle or divorce or other pressure sat in the background, whether the interviewer stayed genuinely open-ended or slid into suggestion, and whether the child was interviewed more than once with the account shifting between sessions. None of that is an attack on a child; it is a test of how reliably the allegation was gathered, which is exactly what proof beyond a reasonable doubt requires. Running alongside the criminal file there is almost always a parallel CPS investigation, on its own clock and under a lower burden of proof, capable of reshaping custody and living arrangements long before the criminal matter ends — so the two have to be managed together, never in isolation.

When the Case Is One Account and Little Else

Intuition says a serious criminal charge must rest on hard proof. In sex cases it frequently does not. A charge can be filed, tried, and end in a long sentence with no DNA, no SANE findings, and no eyewitness — the whole prosecution standing on a single account, given weeks or months after the fact, of a private moment two people remember incompatibly. The seriousness of the charge does not shrink because the evidence is thin. Instead the contest moves onto softer ground, where the verdict depends on whom a jury believes and on how faithfully the accusation was gathered and preserved.

Because so much rides on one account, its reliability is the battleground — and reliability can break down for reasons that have nothing to do with deliberate lying. Accusations arise out of bitter custody and divorce fights, out of encounters that were honestly misread, out of a child steered by an adult, out of grudge, fear, and confusion. Competent defense work does not open by branding the accuser a liar. It holds the State to its burden and then tests the case at every seam: when and to whom the first outcry was made, whether the story held or shifted across retellings, what the forensic and digital record actually shows, and how each piece was collected. Where a Richardson charge grows out of an online sting, the questions sharpen — who first contacted whom, what was actually said, whether investigators respected the statute’s constitutional limits, and whether the State has even correctly identified the person behind a screen name. For someone standing on nothing but an untested word, the presumption of innocence stops being an abstraction and becomes the thing between an accusation and a conviction.

Careers, Clearances, and Campus Discipline

Richardson’s economy runs on technology, and its map is dotted with corporate campuses, the University of Texas at Dallas, and a large concentration of cleared federal contractors and visa-holding professionals. That reality gives a sex accusation here a second life outside the courtroom — one that can move faster and hit harder than the criminal case itself.

For a working professional along the Telecom Corridor, an allegation alone can prompt an employer investigation, a suspended or revoked security clearance, or a licensing-board review, and for a noncitizen employee it can create serious immigration exposure, because many of these offenses are treated as removable or as crimes involving moral turpitude regardless of how the criminal case resolves. Each of those tracks — employer, clearance authority, licensing board, immigration — runs on its own timeline and its own standard of proof, and none waits for a jury. For a student at UT Dallas the parallel process is Title IX and campus conduct: the university can pursue suspension or expulsion under its own rules and a lower burden, sometimes well before the criminal matter is resolved, and statements made in a school proceeding can surface later in court. Educators in the Richardson and Plano ISD communities face yet another layer, since a sex allegation can trigger a TEA/SBEC certification action against a teaching credential. The practical lesson is that a Richardson defense cannot be built around the courtroom alone. From the first meeting, the exposure to a career, a clearance, a visa, a license, or a degree has to be mapped and protected, and every charging and settlement decision graded by what it does to a livelihood, not merely to a sentence.

How L and L Law Group Handles a Richardson Case

L and L Law Group, PLLC is a Frisco criminal-defense firm led by two Co-Founding Partners, Reggie London and Njeri London. We are a short drive from Richardson and appear regularly in the Dallas County criminal courts at Frank Crowley where these cases are decided. Sex cases demand a particular discipline, and ours is organized around the stakes this page keeps returning to: liberty, reputation, the registry, and the collateral fallout that can outlast any sentence.

Our first commitment is timing. Because the investigation is so often where a sex case is won or lost, we take matters on before an arrest and before charges — dealing with Richardson detectives and CPS caseworkers directly and heading off the frightened, well-intended mistakes that quietly wreck a defense. The second is a refusal to accept the State’s file at face value: how the forensic interview was conducted, how the outcry actually surfaced, what a SANE examination established versus merely assumed, how phones and laptops were seized, and how an online sting was set up and run — each is a point where the prosecution’s proof can be measured against the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard, and we press all of them.

The third commitment is to the consequences that outlive the sentence. From the opening meeting we map how a given charge or plea would touch sex-offender registration, a professional license, a security clearance, immigration status, a UT Dallas conduct case, or a parallel CPS matter, because for many Richardson clients those outcomes weigh as heavily as any term of years. The fourth is simply how we treat the people who call. An accusation is not a verdict; the clients and families who reach us are frightened and are owed the presumption of innocence, and they get candid talk about the road ahead, no promises about the ending, and a lawyer who answers the phone at any hour. Consultations are free and confidential, and Spanish-speaking clients are served in their own language through our Spanish-language site. Whether you have been accused in Richardson or have only just learned you are under investigation, the wisest first step is to speak with a lawyer — reach us at (972) 370-5060.