A complete walkthrough of the ten phases that shape a Texas criminal case — from the first investigative contact through post-conviction relief. Each phase is governed by specific statutes and rules; the timing and the decisions made within each window determine outcomes far more than most defendants realize.
A Texas criminal case usually starts long before anyone is arrested. Detectives, federal agents, or grand-jury investigators build a file. The first decision that shapes the outcome is whether you talk to them.
AuthorityTexas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 18 (search warrants) · U.S. Constitution Amendments IV, V, VI · Tex. Const. Art. I §§ 9, 10
Most Texas criminal cases begin with an investigation period — a detective's questions at the door, a target letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office, a grand-jury subpoena, or a search warrant served on a home, phone, or business. During this phase the State (or the federal government) is collecting evidence. You may not know you are a target until the case is far along.
Two constitutional rights govern this phase. The Fourth Amendment requires that any search be supported by a warrant based on probable cause, with specific exceptions (consent, exigency, automobile, plain view). The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination means you do not have to answer questions or sit for an interview. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.22 strictly governs custodial statements; Texas's statutory exclusionary rule at CCP Art. 38.23 is broader than the federal rule — evidence obtained in violation of any law (state or federal) is generally inadmissible.
What happens during investigation determines what evidence the prosecution will have at trial. Confessions made before an arrest get litigated for years. Consent to a search rarely benefits the person consenting. The phone you hand over voluntarily is the phone the State will read for the next eighteen months.
Key defense actions in this phase
Decline interviews politely and in writing; do not agree to "just answer a few questions"
Do not consent to searches of your home, vehicle, or phone — make the State get a warrant
Preserve evidence in your own favor (texts, photos, calendar, witnesses) before it disappears
Engage counsel before any contact with law enforcement, including federal target letters and grand-jury subpoenas
If served with a search warrant, do not obstruct, but do not assist beyond what the warrant compels
The arrest itself happens fast. The decisions made at the jail in the first two or three hours — to give a statement, to take a breath test, to consent to a phone search — drive what the case looks like six months later.
AuthorityCCP Chapter 14 (arrest without warrant) · CCP Chapter 15 (arrest with warrant) · Tex. Penal Code § 38.03 (resisting)
An officer may arrest you on a warrant or, in defined circumstances, without one. Warrantless arrests are limited by CCP Chapter 14 to offenses committed in the officer's presence, felony probable cause, or specific carve-outs (family violence, DWI). After the arrest you are taken to the jail to be booked: fingerprints, photograph, medical screening, property inventoried, classification for housing.
Booking is also when the State tries to lock in the case. Officers may seek consent to search your phone. Investigators may request a recorded interview. In DWI cases you will be asked for a breath or blood specimen — Texas's implied-consent law at Transportation Code § 724 allows refusal, but refusal triggers an Administrative License Revocation (ALR) hearing within 15 days.
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 14.06(a) requires that officers take an arrestee before a magistrate without unnecessary delay. In practice that means the 15.17 hearing happens within roughly 24 to 48 hours of booking; this phase is short, but everything that gets said or signed during it sticks.
Key defense actions in this phase
Invoke the right to silence clearly: "I am not answering questions; I want a lawyer." Then stop talking.
Do not consent to searches of your phone, car, or property
Track exactly when you ask for an attorney — that timing matters for suppression motions later
Have someone get the phone numbers for the magistrate's docket and the bondsman ready
Do not discuss the case on the jail phone — those calls are recorded
Within 48 hours of arrest a magistrate gives you the 15.17 warnings and sets a bond. This is the first decision a judicial officer makes in the case and it shapes the next several months.
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 15.17 requires that an arrested person be brought before a magistrate without unnecessary delay, but not later than 48 hours after arrest. The magistrate informs the accused of the charge, the rights to counsel and to remain silent, the right to terminate any interview, the right to request appointed counsel if indigent, and the right to an examining trial in felony cases.
The magistrate also sets initial bail. CCP Chapter 17 lists the factors: nature and circumstances of the offense, weight of the evidence, defendant's ability to pay, prior criminal history, ties to the community, and danger to the community or to any victim. Recent Texas reforms — including Senate Bill 6 (2021) and follow-on legislation — restrict cash-only bail for certain violent offenses and require risk-informed decisions.
Bond comes in several forms. Cash bond requires the full amount; the court returns it after the case if conditions are met. Surety bond is a bail bondsman's promise backed by collateral, typically at a 10% non-refundable premium. Personal recognizance (PR) bond requires no money but does require strict compliance with conditions. Pretrial supervision often includes drug testing, GPS monitoring, no-contact orders, alcohol restrictions, and travel limits.
Key defense actions in this phase
Be ready to brief the magistrate on community ties, employment, and family obligations — these factors push bond down
If the bond is unreasonably high, file a writ of habeas corpus seeking bond reduction under CCP Art. 17.151
Negotiate conditions carefully — overly broad no-contact or location restrictions can disrupt life and create violation traps
If your case involves an alleged victim, ask whether a protective order is being requested simultaneously
Engage counsel before the magistration hearing if possible; arrangements can be made at most county jails
A felony in Texas requires an indictment by a grand jury (unless waived). A misdemeanor proceeds on an information filed by the prosecutor. Either way, what gets formally charged decides the punishment range and the leverage on both sides.
AuthorityTex. Const. Art. I § 10 (grand jury for felonies) · CCP Chapter 20 (grand jury) · CCP Art. 21 (information & indictment) · Fed. R. Crim. P. 6 (federal grand jury)
Texas Constitution Article I, Section 10 guarantees that no person shall be held to answer for a felony unless indicted by a grand jury — except in cases of impeachment, or with a knowing waiver under CCP Art. 1.141. The grand jury is composed of twelve people who hear the State's evidence in secret; nine votes are required to return a true bill (indictment).
Misdemeanors proceed on an information — a sworn pleading filed by the prosecutor in county court. Felonies proceed by indictment in district court. The formal charging document determines the punishment range: a Class B misdemeanor caps at 180 days county jail; a state-jail felony runs 180 days to 2 years state jail; a first-degree felony exposes the defendant to 5-99 years or life in TDCJ under Tex. Penal Code Chapter 12.
In federal cases, the U.S. Attorney presents to a federal grand jury under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6. Federal indictments are typically broader and include more specific allegations (loss amounts, drug quantities, role) because federal sentencing turns on those numbers under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
Key defense actions in this phase
Negotiate with the prosecutor before indictment — the highest-leverage window is pre-grand-jury
Prepare and submit a "grand-jury packet" if appropriate: defense-investigation materials, character letters, no-prior-conviction proof
For federal cases, respond to a target letter through counsel only; do not testify before the grand jury without invoking the Fifth
If overcharged, file motions to quash defective charging instruments (CCP Art. 27.08) preserving the issue for appeal
Confirm punishment range with the actual indictment text — degree levels can be erroneously charged and corrected before arraignment
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 39.14 — the Michael Morton Act — requires the State to disclose nearly everything in its file as soon as practicable after request. The defense, meanwhile, builds its own version of the events.
AuthorityCCP Art. 39.14 (Michael Morton Act, 2014) · Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) · Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) · Fed. R. Crim. P. 16
Before 2014, Texas criminal discovery was famously narrow. The Michael Morton Act, enacted in 2013 and codified at CCP Art. 39.14, changed that. On timely request, the State must produce all offense reports, witness statements, designated exhibits, photographs, recordings, and electronically stored information that constitute or contain evidence material to any matter involved in the action.
Brady v. Maryland and its progeny impose a constitutional duty on prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence — including impeachment information about State witnesses (Giglio v. United States). This obligation is continuing: even after indictment, even during trial, the State must produce new exculpatory material as it becomes known. A Brady violation discovered post-conviction can support a new trial or a habeas grant under CCP Chapter 11.
While the State produces discovery, the defense investigates independently: interviewing witnesses, retaining experts (forensic, accident reconstruction, mental health, digital forensics), subpoenaing private records, visiting the scene, and analyzing the recordings the State has produced. The two investigations often produce conflicting accounts; that conflict is the foundation for trial strategy and plea leverage.
Key defense actions in this phase
File a written 39.14 discovery request immediately after engagement to start the clock
Audit production for completeness — body-camera, in-car video, 911 audio, lab reports, witness lists
Send preservation letters to third parties (carriers, social media platforms, businesses with surveillance) before deletion windows expire
Retain experts early — last-minute expert designation invites Daubert challenges (Tex. R. Evid. 702 / Kelly v. State)
Identify Brady material and demand it in writing; document any "we don't have that" responses
Motions practice is where many DFW cases get won. Suppression of unlawfully obtained evidence, dismissal of defective charging instruments, severance of co-defendants, and pretrial diversion are all live before trial.
AuthorityCCP Art. 38.23 (Texas statutory exclusionary rule) · CCP Art. 27.02 (motions) · U.S. Const. Amendments IV, V, VI
Texas's statutory exclusionary rule at CCP Art. 38.23 is one of the broadest in the country: evidence obtained in violation of any provision of the constitution or laws of Texas, or the U.S. Constitution, cannot be admitted against the accused. That goes beyond Fourth Amendment law and reaches statutory violations a federal motion would not catch.
Common pretrial motions include: motion to suppress (statements, search-warrant fruit, blood draws, identifications), motion to quash the charging instrument (CCP Art. 27.08), motion in limine (limiting trial topics), motion for speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment and Tex. Const. Art. I § 10, motion to recuse, motion to disqualify the prosecuting attorney's office (Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct), and motion for change of venue.
Several Texas counties operate pretrial-diversion or specialty-court programs (mental-health docket, veterans court, DWI court, drug court). Eligibility depends on offense, prior record, and program capacity. A successful diversion typically results in a non-conviction outcome — vital for clean expunction eligibility under CCP Chapter 55.
Key defense actions in this phase
File suppression motions on every viable theory: Fourth Amendment, Article 38.23 statutory violation, Miranda, voluntariness, "fruit of the poisonous tree"
Request evidentiary hearings — winning a motion to suppress often shifts plea posture immediately
Evaluate specialty court eligibility (mental health, veterans, drug, DWI) as a path to non-conviction outcomes
Move to quash charging instruments that lack specificity, fail to allege essential elements, or include surplus prejudicial allegations
If the prosecution drags, invoke the Sixth Amendment speedy-trial right — Barker v. Wingo (1972) factors govern
Most criminal cases — state and federal — resolve by plea. The question is rarely whether to plead but whether the offered plea reflects the true case value after investigation and motions practice.
AuthorityCCP Art. 26.13 (plea admonishments) · Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012) · Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) · Tex. Penal Code Ch. 12
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 26.13 requires the trial court to admonish a defendant before accepting any plea: the punishment range, the consequences of failing to complete probation, the deportation consequences, the sex-offender registration consequences (if applicable), and the absence of certain appellate rights from a plea bargain. These admonishments are part of the official record.
Plea deals come in three structures. Charge bargains reduce the level of offense charged (e.g., a felony to a misdemeanor). Count bargains dismiss some counts in exchange for a plea to others. Sentence bargains agree on a specific punishment recommendation. Federal cases use the same structures but the practical effect is filtered through the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.
Counsel has a constitutional duty to communicate plea offers (Lafler v. Cooper) and to advise on collateral consequences such as deportation (Padilla v. Kentucky). The Padilla rule in particular has reshaped how non-citizen pleas are handled — categorical or aggravated-felony pleas can trigger removal regardless of the sentence.
Key defense actions in this phase
Demand a written plea offer with all conditions — verbal offers do not bind future prosecutors
Calculate collateral consequences: immigration, professional licensing, firearm rights, sex-offender registration, driver's license, public housing, student aid
Compare the plea to realistic post-trial outcomes (probation vs prison, deferred adjudication vs straight conviction)
Negotiate for deferred adjudication where eligible — successful completion typically allows non-disclosure under Tex. Gov't Code Ch. 411
If the case is federal, model the Sentencing Guidelines outcome with and without acceptance of responsibility (USSG § 3E1.1)
If the case does not resolve, it goes to trial. Texas misdemeanors are tried to six-person juries; felonies to twelve. Federal felonies follow Fed. R. Crim. P. The defense decides whether to elect jury or court trial, and whether the judge or jury assesses punishment.
AuthorityCCP Chapter 35 (jury selection) · CCP Chapter 36 (trial procedure) · Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) · Tex. Const. Art. V § 13 (verdict)
Voir dire — jury selection under CCP Chapter 35 — comes first. Each side has peremptory strikes (ten per side in non-capital felonies; three in misdemeanors). Strikes cannot be exercised on the basis of race or gender; Batson v. Kentucky and J.E.B. v. Alabama govern challenges to discriminatory strikes. Jurors are also struck for cause when bias is shown.
After jury selection comes opening statements, the State's case-in-chief, motions for directed verdict (CCP Art. 36.16) if the State's evidence is legally insufficient, the defense case (the defendant has no obligation to testify and the jury is instructed accordingly), rebuttal, closing arguments, the jury charge (Tex. Const. Art. V § 13 requires unanimous verdict), and deliberation.
If guilty, Texas allows the jury to assess punishment if elected before voir dire — otherwise the judge sets sentence. Federal practice is different: a jury determines guilt; the judge sentences under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Sentencing hearings can run hours and turn on character witnesses, expert testimony, victim impact, and prior history.
Key defense actions in this phase
Run focus-group simulations on close calls (consent, identification, self-defense) before voir dire — strangers reveal what jurors actually hear
Prepare every cross-examination in writing — the most damaging questions are the ones the witness cannot escape
Decide early whether to elect jury or court trial; the State has no veto
Decide who assesses punishment (judge or jury) before voir dire — the choice is binding
Preserve every objection on the record; the court of appeals will not consider what is not preserved
Punishment ranges are fixed by statute. Where in the range a defendant lands turns on mitigation, criminal history, victim impact, and how well the defense told the human story.
Texas Penal Code Chapter 12 fixes punishment ranges by class and degree: Class C misdemeanor (fine only), Class B (up to 180 days county jail), Class A (up to 1 year), state-jail felony (180 days to 2 years), third-degree felony (2-10 years), second-degree (2-20), first-degree (5-99 or life), capital felony (life without parole or death). Enhancements push the range up for prior convictions, deadly-weapon findings, and offenses against children, peace officers, or elderly victims.
Texas allows several sentencing structures. Deferred adjudication under CCP Art. 42A.101 defers a finding of guilt while the defendant completes community supervision — a successful completion supports later non-disclosure under Tex. Gov't Code Ch. 411. Straight probation (community supervision) follows a conviction. Straight time means doing the sentence in jail or TDCJ. Eligibility for each option depends on offense, prior record, and judge discretion.
Federal sentencing is more structured. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines produce an advisory range based on the offense level and criminal history category. Courts must also consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors (nature of offense, history of defendant, need for deterrence, protection of public, rehabilitation, parsimony principle). Variances from the Guidelines range are common when mitigation is presented effectively.
Key defense actions in this phase
Build a mitigation package: school records, medical history, mental-health diagnoses, employment, military service, family responsibilities, character witnesses
Identify any cooperation, restitution paid, or rehabilitation completed before sentencing
For federal cases, work the Guidelines worksheet: acceptance of responsibility, role adjustments, criminal-history miscalculations
Negotiate sentence-bargain alternatives early — deferred adjudication, drug court, or specialty docket can produce dramatically different outcomes
Prepare client allocution carefully; what is said to the court at sentencing is on the record forever
A judgment is not always the end. Direct appeal, habeas corpus, expunction, and non-disclosure each address a different problem — and each has its own deadline and procedural rules.
AuthorityTex. R. App. P. 25 (notice of appeal) · CCP Art. 11 (habeas corpus) · CCP Chapter 55 (expunction) · Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 411 (non-disclosure)
Direct appeal challenges errors at trial. In Texas, the notice of appeal is due within 30 days of sentencing (90 days if a motion for new trial is filed) under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 25 and 26. The court of appeals reviews preserved errors (objections made and ruled on at trial). Federal appeals go to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (the Fifth Circuit for Texas) with 14-day notice under Fed. R. App. P. 4.
Habeas corpus under CCP Art. 11.07 (post-conviction) and Art. 11.072 (community supervision) addresses constitutional violations not reachable on direct appeal — ineffective assistance, newly discovered evidence, Brady violations discovered post-trial. Federal habeas under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 follows AEDPA's strict one-year statute and exhaustion requirements.
Expunction under CCP Chapter 55 clears the entire record of an arrest from public databases for dismissals, acquittals, deferred-adjudication cases that ended without conviction in specific situations, and certain other outcomes. Non-Disclosure under Tex. Gov't Code Ch. 411 (Order of Non-Disclosure) seals the record from public view but preserves it for law-enforcement, prosecutor, and licensing-agency access — primarily for successfully completed deferred adjudication.
Key defense actions in this phase
File notice of appeal within 30 days of sentencing; missing this deadline forfeits the appeal absent extraordinary equitable relief
Preserve appellate issues at trial — objections, requests, offers of proof — because unpreserved error usually waives the issue
Audit eligibility for expunction (CCP 55.01) immediately upon any non-conviction outcome — the waiting period clock starts at disposition
Audit eligibility for non-disclosure under Tex. Gov't Code 411.0735 upon completion of deferred adjudication, including the offense-specific waiting period
Track collateral consequences continuing past judgment: driver's-license revocation, firearm rights, professional licensing actions, immigration removal proceedings
How long does a Texas criminal case take from arrest to disposition?
A first-offense misdemeanor with a clear plea path can resolve in 60 to 120 days. A contested felony with motion practice typically takes 9 to 18 months. Federal cases follow the Speedy Trial Act's 70-day clock under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, though excludable time often extends that window. Cases requiring expert work, complex digital forensics, or multiple co-defendants run longer.
Do I need a lawyer before I am charged?
Pre-arrest representation is the single highest-leverage window in a criminal case. Counsel can negotiate with the prosecutor before indictment, respond to grand-jury subpoenas, prepare a grand-jury packet, decline interviews, and preserve favorable evidence. The investigation phase decides what the prosecution will have at trial; what happens then is the most consequential and least reversible part of the process.
What is the 48-hour rule in Texas?
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 15.17 requires that an arrested person be brought before a magistrate without unnecessary delay, but not later than 48 hours after arrest. The magistrate gives statutory warnings — right to remain silent, right to counsel, right to terminate any interview — and sets initial bail. The 48-hour rule is one of the strongest procedural protections in Texas criminal practice.
What is the difference between expunction and non-disclosure?
Expunction under CCP Chapter 55 clears the record of an arrest from public databases — police, court, DPS, private background-check companies — typically available for dismissals, acquittals, and certain deferred outcomes. Non-disclosure under Tex. Gov't Code Chapter 411 (Order of Non-Disclosure) seals the record from public view while preserving law-enforcement, prosecutor, and licensing-agency access — typically for successfully completed deferred adjudication. Expunction is broader relief; non-disclosure is the fallback when expunction is unavailable.
Can the State search my phone without a warrant?
Not as a general matter. Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), held that warrantless search of a cell phone incident to arrest violates the Fourth Amendment. Exceptions exist — consent, exigent circumstances, search incident to a properly executed warrant — but the default rule is that phone searches require a warrant supported by probable cause and particularity. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.23 reinforces that result: evidence from an unlawful phone search is generally inadmissible.
What happens at a federal target letter?
A target letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office means you are the focus of a grand-jury investigation. The letter usually offers an opportunity to testify, decline to testify by invoking the Fifth Amendment, or negotiate before indictment. Each option has implications. Counsel should respond — never testify before a federal grand jury without representation, and never decline to respond at all. Pre-indictment negotiation can produce reduced charges, declination, or referral to administrative resolution.
Can a plea bargain be revoked once accepted?
Generally no, once entered and accepted by the court. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 26.13 requires the court to admonish defendants on the consequences of a plea, including waiver of certain appellate rights. There are narrow exceptions: an involuntary plea, ineffective assistance under Strickland v. Washington and Lafler v. Cooper, or breach of the plea agreement by the State. Most attempted plea withdrawals fail; the right time to evaluate a plea is before signing the form.
Will hiring a lawyer make me look guilty?
No. The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Texas Constitution guarantee the right to counsel. Prosecutors and judges expect represented defendants and treat the presence of counsel as a sign that the matter is being handled seriously, not as evidence of guilt. Self-representation — particularly in a felony case — is what raises eyebrows.
About the Authors
Reggie London, Esq.
Co-Founding Partner · Criminal Defense
Texas Bar No. 24043514. Admitted in the U.S. District Courts for the Northern (TXND) and Eastern (TXED) Districts of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Trial-tested criminal defense across the DFW metroplex.
Njeri London, Esq.
Co-Founding Partner · Criminal Defense
Texas Bar No. 24043266. Frisco-based, full-firm criminal defense for state and select federal matters across nine DFW counties.
Service Areas
L&L Law Group represents clients across North Texas counties for DWI, assault, drug crimes, juvenile defense, outstanding warrants, bond reduction, and expunction matters.