☎ Call Today Free Consult
Criminal Defense • Frisco, Texas
Serving 9 DFW Counties — Collin • Dallas • Denton • Tarrant • Rockwall • Kaufman • Ellis • Johnson • Hunt — Available 24/7
The L and L Law Group team at our Frisco, Texas office — co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London with staff
Serving Kaufman County from our Frisco officeEst. 2011
The L and L Law Group team·Frisco, Texas

Kaufman County Drug Crimes Defense Attorney — Frisco, TX

Why a drug charge in Kaufman County is serious

A Texas drug arrest in Kaufman County is not a paperwork problem. It is a felony or jailable misdemeanor that runs through the Kaufman County Criminal District Attorney — currently led by Erleigh Wiley — and is filed at 100 W Mulberry St, Kaufman, TX 75142. Kaufman County has a population of roughly 145,000, which means the criminal docket sees a steady flow of controlled-substance cases: roadside stops from local PDs, residential warrants worked by the sheriff's narcotics division, and interdiction stops on county highways including US-175 and I-20.

The DA's office in Kaufman County concentrates its drug-case investment on three things. First, it works closely with Kaufman County Sheriff's Office Narcotics Division and the I-20 East corridor DPS / Forney PD interdiction partnership, which means the State usually has a DPS lab report, a chain-of-custody log, and a body-cam recording before the first court date. Second, the office's enforcement focus right now is on I-20 corridor interdiction east of Mesquite, Forney growth-corridor residential cases, and trafficking-route cases connecting Dallas to East Texas. Third, the office screens cases for diversion eligibility at intake — meaning that the window for diversion or charge reduction often closes within the first 30 to 45 days after arrest, well before a typical pretrial conference.

Court culture in Kaufman County matters. Kaufman-area judges run their dockets with predictable expectations on motion practice, lab-report production, and trial-readiness. Failing to file a Brady demand or to challenge the affidavit of the arresting officer in the first 60 days is not strategic — it is malpractice. Equally important: Kaufman County maintains Kaufman County Drug Court (post-plea, voluntary treatment docket), which is an option in the right case but a trap in the wrong one. We never enter a Drug Court plea before we have audited the State's evidence ourselves.

Texas controlled substance penalty groups

Texas does not punish all drugs the same. The Texas Health & Safety Code Chapter 481 (the Texas Controlled Substances Act) sorts every substance into a "Penalty Group" — and the group plus the weight determines the punishment range. Here are the groups in plain English:

Substance / weightPenalty classRange
PG 1 < 1 gState jail felony180 days–2 years + $10,000
PG 1, 1–4 g3rd-degree felony2–10 years + $10,000
PG 1, 4–200 g2nd-degree felony2–20 years + $10,000
PG 1, 200–400 g1st-degree felony5–99 years/life + $100,000
PG 1-B (fentanyl) any felony qty1st-degree+ enhancedUp to life + $250,000
Marijuana < 2 ozClass B misdemeanorUp to 180 days + $2,000

Defense strategies for drug cases in Kaufman County

Every Texas drug case has four pressure points, and Kaufman County cases are no different. We attack each one in writing — discovery requests, motions to suppress, motions to compel, and Brady demands — in the first 60 days of the case.

1. The stop or the entry

Under the Fourth Amendment and Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.23, evidence obtained through an unlawful stop, search, or entry is inadmissible. Roadside drug cases in Kaufman County hinge on the legality of the traffic stop and the scope of any consent or warrant. We pull the dashcam and bodycam, time-stamp the seizure window, and challenge the reasonable suspicion under Wade v. State, 422 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013), and Davis v. State, 947 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Residential cases get the same treatment under the four corners of the warrant affidavit (Massey v. State, 933 S.W.2d 141).

2. Constructive vs. actual possession

If the drugs were not on your person, the State has to prove "affirmative links" between you and the contraband under Evans v. State, 202 S.W.3d 158 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006), and Tate v. State, 500 S.W.3d 410. Shared cars, shared apartments, and group-occupancy situations are common in Kaufman County cases — and they are routinely defensible because the State cannot meet its proof.

3. The DPS lab

Texas DPS labs in Garland and Austin process most Kaufman County drug evidence. We audit the lab report against Mata v. State, 46 S.W.3d 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001), the Texas Rules of Evidence 901 / 902 chain-of-custody requirements, and the analyst's certification. A late or unsupported lab report can collapse the State's case.

4. Intent to distribute

The State frequently overcharges possession as possession-with-intent based on quantity, packaging, scales, or text messages. Texas case law — Branch v. State, 599 S.W.2d 324, and Williams v. State, 902 S.W.2d 505 — requires more than quantity alone. We push back on the intent element at every charging conference because a successful reduction from PWITD to possession is a one-step reduction in penalty range.

Case timeline

  1. Arrest and booking. Police book you into the Kaufman County jail. Evidence is bagged and sent to DPS Garland or Austin for testing.
  2. Magistrate and bond. A magistrate sets bond within 24-48 hours. Standard schedules cover most PG 3 / marijuana cases; PG 1 felonies typically require a formal bond hearing.
  3. Arraignment. We enter a plea of not guilty, file a notice of representation, and serve a discovery request on the Kaufman County Criminal District Attorney.
  4. Motion to suppress. We file a written motion challenging the stop, the search, the lab, or the chain of custody. The court holds an evidentiary hearing.
  5. Pretrial conferences. Plea offers, lab-report production, and trial-readiness conferences happen here. Diversion eligibility is also confirmed at this stage.
  6. Trial or plea. Cases that do not resolve through diversion, dismissal, or negotiated plea are set for jury trial. Most Texas drug cases never reach jury selection — and the ones that do, we try ourselves.

Our drug crimes defense process

  1. Free 24/7 intake call. A co-founding partner answers — no paralegal screen, no answering service.
  2. Discovery and lab review. We pull the offense report, dashcam, bodycam, and DPS lab report and audit the chain of custody.
  3. Motion practice. We file motions to suppress, motions to compel, and Brady demands. Suppression collapses the State's evidence in most drug cases.
  4. Negotiation or diversion. We push for Kaufman County's first-offender deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) track where appropriate, deferred adjudication, or a misdemeanor reduction with no permanent record.
  5. Trial readiness. Cases that cannot be diverted or reduced go to a jury — and we try them ourselves.
7
Penalty Groups in Texas drug law (PG 1, 1-A, 1-B, 2, 2-A, 3, 4) plus marijuana
Source: Tex. Health & Safety Code §§ 481.102–.105, § 481.121. Verify.
2–20
Years in TDCJ for a PG 1 second-degree felony (4–200 grams)
Source: Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.115(d); Tex. Penal Code § 12.33. Verify.
145,000
Population of Kaufman County — the size of the docket the Kaufman County Criminal District Attorney runs
Source: U.S. Census Bureau population estimate (most recent vintage). Verify.

Arrested for a drug case in Kaufman County?

Free consultation. Direct attorney access. We pick up after-hours for jail-release calls.

Call (972) 370-5060

Kaufman County drug case FAQs

Will the Kaufman County Criminal District Attorney offer pretrial diversion on a first drug case in Kaufman County?

Erleigh Wiley's office runs Kaufman County's first-offender deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) track. Eligibility is screened case by case — typical factors include no prior felony, no weapon allegation, and possession quantity inside the program's cap. We screen and apply for diversion in the first 30 days because seats are limited.

How does Kaufman County handle fentanyl cases differently from other drug cases?

Following the 2023 Texas Legislature's amendment to Health & Safety Code § 481.1123 — which created Penalty Group 1-B specifically for fentanyl — Kaufman County prosecutors charge fentanyl cases at the highest available penalty class. Lab confirmation through DPS Garland or Austin is required before indictment, which creates a real suppression window if the chain of custody breaks.

What is the Kaufman County Drug Court and can I get in?

Kaufman County Drug Court (post-plea, voluntary treatment docket) is a post-plea, voluntary treatment docket for non-violent felony defendants. Admission usually requires a plea of guilty held in abeyance, regular drug testing, treatment compliance, and 12 to 24 months of supervision. Successful completion typically reduces or dismisses the underlying charge. Not every defendant should accept Drug Court — we audit the strength of the State's case before recommending it.

Where is the Kaufman County courthouse and where do drug cases get filed?

Drug cases in Kaufman County are filed at 100 W Mulberry St, Kaufman, TX 75142. Felony controlled-substance cases are assigned to the criminal district courts; Class A and B misdemeanor possession cases are assigned to the county courts at law. Our Frisco office is a short drive from the Kaufman courthouse.

What is the difference between actual and constructive possession in Kaufman County?

Actual possession means the drug is on your person. Constructive possession — Texas case law from Tate v. State, 500 S.W.3d 410 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016), and Evans v. State, 202 S.W.3d 158 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) — requires the State to prove "affirmative links" between the defendant and the contraband. Distance, ownership of the vehicle, fingerprints, statements, smell, and exclusive access are the standard link factors. Constructive-possession cases in shared vehicles, shared apartments, and roadside stops are routinely defensible.

Can a Kaufman County drug charge be expunged or sealed?

Dismissals, acquittals, and successfully completed pretrial diversions are eligible for expunction under Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 55. Successfully completed deferred adjudication can be sealed by order of nondisclosure under Government Code § 411.072 or § 411.0735, depending on the offense. Direct convictions and probation revocations are not expungeable. See our expunction page.

How quickly should I call a lawyer after a Kaufman County drug arrest?

Within the first 24 hours. Bond decisions, magistrate warnings, and the State's first look at the lab evidence all happen inside the first business day. Calling early lets us file the notice of representation before the DA's intake screening — which is when most charge-amendment opportunities exist.

Do I have to appear at every Kaufman County court setting on a drug case?

No. Many pretrial conferences in Kaufman County can be handled by counsel through written waivers under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 27.13 and 27.14. Texas law requires your personal appearance at arraignment, plea, sentencing, and trial — and at any suppression hearing where you may testify. We always confirm appearance requirements with the court coordinator before each setting.

Delivery vs. possession in a Kaufman County drug case

In a Kaufman County drug case, there is a real difference between being accused of holding a controlled substance and being accused of moving it. A possession charge looks at whether someone had the drug. A manufacture or delivery charge under Tex. Health & Safety Code §481.112 looks at whether someone made the substance or passed it to another person, and it carries far steeper punishment ranges than simple possession of the same amount. That gap matters from the first court setting at the Kaufman County Courthouse, because the label on the charge shapes everything that follows.

What pushes a case from possession into delivery territory is the legal meaning of "deliver." Under Tex. Health & Safety Code §481.002(8), to "deliver" is defined to include an actual transfer of the substance, a constructive transfer, and an offer to sell. The offer-to-sell piece is the part many people do not expect. Because an offer counts, a person can face a delivery allegation based on something they are said to have said, even in a situation where no drugs ever changed hands and nothing was handed over.

From a defense point of view, that definition is also where the State's burden lives. To support a delivery charge, the Kaufman County District Attorney's Office has to prove an actual transfer, a constructive transfer, or a genuine offer to sell, not just suspicion or proximity. So the exact words allegedly used, the full context around them, and the reliability of any informant, wired conversation, or recording become central questions. Those details often decide whether what the State is calling a delivery really fits the statute, or whether the conduct, if anything, lines up only with possession.

Authority: Tex. Health & Safety Code §481.112, §481.002(8).

Talk to a real attorney

Send a few details and a co-founding partner will reach back within an hour, day or night. No call center. No paralegal screen.

By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy. No attorney-client relationship is formed until a written engagement is signed.

Free downloads & tools

References & Statutes

  1. Texas Health & Safety Code Chapter 481 (Texas Controlled Substances Act)
  2. H&S § 481.102 (Penalty Group 1) · § 481.1023 (PG 1-B fentanyl)
  3. H&S § 481.115 (PG 1 possession offenses and ranges)
  4. H&S § 481.121 (Marijuana possession)
  5. Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.23 (exclusionary rule)
  6. CCP Chapter 42A (Community Supervision & deferred adjudication)
  7. CCP Chapter 55 (Expunction of Criminal Records)
  8. Evans v. State, 202 S.W.3d 158 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (constructive possession affirmative links)
  9. Tate v. State, 500 S.W.3d 410 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (constructive possession)
  10. Mata v. State, 46 S.W.3d 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (lab analyst testimony)
Call Email Map Top
developed by MPR Digital Legal Services