Irving Sex Crimes Attorney

Irving is a city defined by movement — DFW International Airport on its western edge, the corporate towers of Las Colinas at its center, a University of Dallas campus, and one of the most internationally diverse populations in Texas. For a person accused of a sex crime here, that character sets the stakes: a single allegation can put a job, a security clearance, a professional license, and even lawful immigration status at risk all at once, long before a courtroom ever weighs the evidence. And Irving cases do not stay in Irving. Because the city sits in Dallas County, a felony sex charge is booked into the county jail downtown and tried at the Frank Crowley Courts Building by the Dallas County District Attorney. L and L Law Group is a Frisco firm that defends the full range of sexual-assault and sex-offense allegations in the Dallas County courts, and this page lays out the offenses, the collateral fallout that hits Irving residents especially hard, the local process, and the moves that protect the accused. Reach us at (972) 370-5060.

Peer Recognition

Martindale-Hubbell® 2026 Honors

Independent peer-review ratings recognizing legal ability and ethical standards.

Awards reflect peer-reviewed ratings only. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Why an Irving Accusation Puts More Than Liberty at Risk

Most guides to sex-crime defense start with prison, and prison certainly belongs in the conversation. But in Irving the first blow often lands somewhere else. This is a city built around employers who cannot wait for a criminal case to run its course: airline and airport operations at DFW, the Fortune-500 and corporate-headquarters cluster in Las Colinas, staffing and logistics firms, healthcare and hospitality companies, and a school district that touches thousands of families. For the people who work in those settings, an allegation alone — not a conviction, not even a formal charge — can set off an employer investigation, a suspended badge or clearance, a licensing-board inquiry, or an administrative action against a teacher, all on timelines that have nothing to do with the courthouse downtown.

Layer onto that Irving’s standing as one of the most internationally diverse cities in Texas, with a large share of residents who are visa holders, green-card residents, or members of mixed-status families, and a second front opens: immigration exposure that can outweigh any sentence in the criminal case. The through-line is that in Irving the collateral consequences of a sex allegation are frequently the sharpest part of it, and they can begin moving the day the accusation surfaces. A defense that treats the criminal charge as the only thing in play — ignoring the job, the clearance, the license, and the immigration file — is not really defending an Irving client.

That is the lens this page uses. The sections below walk through the offenses and their punishment ranges, the collateral fronts that hit Irving residents hardest, the local Dallas County process, and the strategy — which, in these cases, usually begins during the investigation, before a single charge is filed. If you would rather talk than read, the line is (972) 370-5060, and the first conversation is free and confidential.

The Sex Offenses We Defend and What They Carry

Texas groups a startling range of conduct under the heading of sex offenses, and where a given accusation lands on that ladder decides almost everything about the defense. At the top sit first-degree felonies with the steepest punishment the Penal Code permits; at the bottom, misdemeanors resolved in a county court at law. Two charges hang the highest stakes on an Irving client, so start there. Sexual assault under Penal Code Section 22.011 is ordinarily a second-degree felony, exposing a person to two to twenty years and a fine reaching $10,000, and it climbs to first-degree in defined circumstances. Aggravated sexual assault under Section 22.021 is a first-degree felony of five to ninety-nine years or life, and when the complainant is a young child the statute sets a floor of twenty-five years. Our dedicated Dallas sexual-assault defense page works through consent, SANE examinations, and DNA in far more depth.

Beyond those two, the offenses we most often defend for Irving residents cluster into a handful of categories. Child-contact offenses include indecency with a child under Section 21.11 — a second-degree felony for contact, third-degree for exposure — and, where a school employee is involved, the improper educator–student relationship under Section 21.12, a second-degree felony that also throws a TEA/SBEC certification case on top of the criminal one. Internet-driven offenses cover online solicitation of a minor under Section 33.021, often assembled entirely from a sting chat log, and possession of child pornography under Section 43.26, whose third-degree baseline climbs with the volume of material and any prior history. At the misdemeanor end, indecent exposure under Section 21.08 is a Class B offense punishable by up to 180 days, tried in a county court at law — and a separate Chapter 62 charge, failure to register, targets people already on the registry, taking its grade from their underlying offense. Every one of those links to a page that walks the elements and the defenses; the full catalog lives on our sex-crimes practice overview, and the umbrella Dallas sex-crimes page gives the countywide view.

One caution runs through the whole list: severity on paper is not the same as harm in practice. Indecent exposure is “only” a misdemeanor, yet it can still put a person on the registry and end a career — so in Irving, where careers and clearances are so exposed, no charge on this ladder is one to treat lightly.

From Irving to Downtown: Jail, Courthouse, Prosecutor

An Irving sex case has a two-address geography that catches families off guard. The arrest and the courtroom are not in the same place, and neither is in Irving proper. Here is how the pieces fit.

The Irving Police Department investigates and makes the arrest, and the person is first processed at the city’s holding facility for a short period. Because a felony sex allegation belongs to the county, the accused is then transferred to the Lew Sterrett Justice Center — the Dallas County Jail — at 111 W. Commerce Street in downtown Dallas, which the Sheriff operates and where county intake, magistration, and bond posting occur. The case is prosecuted about a mile away at the Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 N. Riverfront Boulevard, the hub of the Dallas County criminal courts, where the felony district courts and the county criminal courts at law both sit and where the Dallas County Criminal District Attorney tries cases for the State.

The sequence takes some of the dread out of it. A Texas felony proceeds by indictment, so before an Irving sex case can advance, a Dallas County grand jury has to return a true bill; only then is the matter docketed to one of the district courts at Frank Crowley. From there it follows a familiar rhythm — an arraignment or first appearance, a run of pretrial settings where the State and defense report status, motion practice (including fights over search warrants, statements, and the admissibility of forensic and outcry evidence), and, if the case does not resolve, a trial before a Dallas County jury. Misdemeanor sex offenses skip the grand jury and travel a shorter path through the county criminal courts at law in the same complex. Our overview of what happens after a Texas arrest lays out each stage, and Irving families can also consult the firm’s Dallas County resource hub for directory-level detail on the courts and the jail.

Immigration, Clearances, and Irving’s Global Workforce

This section exists because Irving’s population makes it necessary. In a city this internationally connected, a sex allegation frequently threatens things a criminal sentence never touches, and those threats can move faster than the case.

Immigration status. For a resident who is not a U.S. citizen, a sex-offense conviction — and, in some situations, a plea that looks like a favorable outcome in criminal court — can trigger consequences under federal immigration law, from inadmissibility to removal, depending on the precise offense and disposition. The criminal exposure and the immigration exposure do not always rise and fall together, which means a resolution that trims prison time can still be catastrophic to a person’s ability to remain in the country. Any defense of a non-citizen Irving client has to weigh both, and the analysis belongs at the start, not after a plea is entered.

Security clearances and airport credentials. Irving’s economy runs on cleared and credentialed workers — aviation and airport staff, defense and government contractors, and corporate employees with sensitive access. A pending sex allegation can prompt a suspended clearance or a revoked airport badge well before any court rules, and the agency or employer conducting that review answers to its own standard and schedule.

Professional licenses and corporate careers. The Las Colinas corridor is dense with board-licensed professionals and executives whose employers impose their own conduct rules. A licensing review or an internal investigation can open on the strength of an accusation alone. A defense worth the name maps this terrain in advance, guards against disclosures that are not legally required, and grades every charging and settlement option by what it does to a career and a life, not merely to a sentence. The registry, discussed further below, sits on top of all of it.

The Investigation Stage — Before Any Arrest

Most people picture a criminal case beginning with an arrest. In sex-offense matters it usually begins much earlier and much more quietly, and that gap is where the case is often decided. An Irving investigation can run for weeks or months — detectives building a file, interviewing a complainant, waiting on device downloads — all before a single charge is filed and long before anyone is booked. The practical takeaway could not be simpler: the right time to bring in a lawyer is the day you learn you are being looked at, not the day the cuffs come out.

During that stretch, investigators tend to make a handful of polite, reasonable-sounding requests. Each is designed to gather proof, and each can quietly strengthen the State’s hand:

• “Come tell us your side.” A recorded station-house statement rarely helps and frequently supplies the missing piece.
• “Take a polygraph to clear it up.” The result is not evidence in court, but the interview around it can be.
• “Let us take a quick look at your phone.” Consent to search a device or cloud account can open the entire case.
• “Just reach out and talk to them.” Any contact with the complainant — an apology, an explanation — can become a new count.

Counsel engaged at this point does two things. First, it takes the client out of the line of fire — a lawyer, not the accused, deals with the Irving detective and with any CPS caseworker, decides what is and is not shared, declines the polygraph or the device search when that is right, and sometimes surfaces facts that influence whether a charge issues at all. Second, it prevents the panicked missteps that undo defendants before they ever reach a courtroom: wiping texts can create a fresh tampering charge and reads as guilt, and messaging the complainant manufactures the very evidence the State wants. If a detective or a caseworker has already made contact about an Irving allegation, that conversation is not one to handle alone.

Child Allegations and the Forensic Interview

A case with a child complainant runs on a different track from the first day, and one event tends to sit at its center: the recorded forensic interview. Texas does not have children recount an allegation across a squad-room table. Instead a specially trained interviewer meets the child at a Dallas County children’s advocacy center and records a single session while detectives and a Child Protective Services worker watch through glass or on a monitor. The idea is to capture the account once, cleanly, in language suited to the child’s age, without the repetition and leading questions that can taint it.

Because prosecutors build so much of their case on that tape, defense counsel goes through it frame by frame — not to badger a child, but to gauge how trustworthy the account really is, which is the very thing the reasonable-doubt standard exists to test. Did the outcry emerge on its own, or after an adult asked pointed questions? Who first heard it, and in what setting? Was a custody battle, a divorce, or some other adult conflict simmering in the background? Did the interviewer keep the questions genuinely open, or nudge toward a desired answer? Did the account stay consistent, or move between tellings? Almost always a CPS case marches alongside the criminal one, under a lighter burden of proof and on its own timetable, with the power to rearrange custody and where a child lives well before a jury is ever seated. For that reason the criminal defense and the CPS matter have to be steered in tandem, never treated as separate problems.

When the Case Is One Account and Little Else

People assume a serious felony must rest on hard proof — a lab result, a documented injury, an eyewitness. Sex cases routinely defy that assumption. A charge can be filed, taken to trial, and end in decades of prison with none of it: no DNA, no SANE findings, no bystander who saw a thing. In a great many prosecutions the whole edifice rests on words alone — a report made long after the fact, two irreconcilable memories of a private moment. The absence of physical evidence does not make the charge any less grave; it simply moves the contest onto terrain where the outcome depends on which person a jury finds more believable and on how the accusation came together in the first place.

When everything rides on a single narrative, the credibility of that narrative is the whole ballgame — and it can break down for reasons that have nothing to do with deliberate lying. Allegations grow out of vicious custody and divorce fights, out of moments that were honestly misunderstood, out of a child coached or pressured by an adult, out of resentment and fear. Competent defense work does not open by calling the accuser a liar. It starts by making the State prove its case and then probes every joint of that case: the timing and audience of the first outcry, whether the story firmed up or drifted with each retelling, what the digital and forensic trail actually establishes, and how carefully each item was gathered and kept. In the internet cases that reach Irving through a sting, the inquiry gets sharper still — who initiated contact, what was truly said versus implied, whether officers respected the constitutional lines the statute draws, and whether the State can even prove who was on the other end of the keyboard. For a client with nothing against them but an untested accusation, the presumption of innocence is not a slogan; it is the last thing standing between a claim and a conviction.

Sex-Offender Registration and Its Reach

Ask people facing these charges what frightens them most and many will say prison. Ask them a year later and the answer is often the registry. It is the consequence clients most consistently underrate going in, which is why it belongs here in the main text and not buried in a disclaimer. For a lot of Irving defendants — the ones with a career, a clearance, or a visa on the line — whether the case ends in a registrable conviction matters more than the length of any sentence.

Texas sets the framework in Chapter 62 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It enumerates which convictions and adjudications are “reportable” and how long the obligation lasts — a ten-year term measured from the end of the sentence for some offenses, a lifetime for others. What gives the registry its weight is everything it does beyond filing a form. The registrant’s name and address go into a public, searchable database. Residency and employment restrictions follow. Re-verification has to be done in person on a fixed schedule. And the listing surfaces on background checks for as long as the duty runs — which, for a professional or a security-cleared worker in Irving, can be the single most damaging thing about the whole case.

Here is the leverage point. The duty does not attach to conduct in the abstract; it attaches to the exact offense of conviction and the way the case is resolved. That means the specific count the State ultimately accepts, and the precise shape of a plea or verdict, can determine whether any registration obligation arises in the first place. Where the facts and the statute allow, steering a case toward a non-reportable resolution can be worth more to a client than trimming months off a sentence — a trade many defendants would take without hesitation if they understood it early enough. And even an existing duty is not always forever: some registrants can petition for early termination, a remedy we pursue. Whether the goal is to avoid the registry, shorten the term, or later end it, that analysis runs from our first meeting, not from the sentencing hearing.

Bond and the Conditions Attached to Release

Two separate things happen at a bond setting, and in a sex case both cut deep. One is the money: how much it takes to secure release. The other is the set of conditions the accused has to obey while the case is pending — and because these allegations so often involve a specific person, frequently a relative, an acquaintance, or a child, those conditions in Dallas County can reach into nearly every corner of daily life.

The timing is fast. Once the accused is transferred downtown to Lew Sterrett, the law requires a prompt appearance before a magistrate, generally inside forty-eight hours. At that hearing, held under Article 15.17, the magistrate recites the charges and the person’s rights and fixes bail. The amount is guided by the factors in Article 17.15 — enough to reasonably assure the person returns to court but not so much as to be oppressive, weighed against the seriousness of the charge, the accused’s ability to pay, the depth of their ties to the area, and the safety of the alleged victim and the community.

Then come the conditions, and this is what catches families off guard. On a sex allegation a magistrate will almost always attach terms to the bond: no contact of any kind with the accuser or their household, stay-away orders covering schools, parks, and other places children gather, electronic monitoring in some cases, surrender of a passport — a live and serious issue in a city organized around an international airport and a globally mobile population — and, in online matters, a cutoff from the very devices and accounts the investigation revolves around. The practical reach is enormous. A single condition can decide whether a parent may sleep in the family home, see their children, or keep the phone their job depends on, and one violation can revoke the bond and land the person back in the county jail on a new warrant. That is why early counsel pays for itself twice: once at the outset, arguing the number and the conditions down to only what the case genuinely warrants, and again later, returning to court to modify a term that has proven impossible to live under. The mechanics are covered on our bail and bond requirements and bond conditions pages.

How L and L Law Group Works an Irving Case

L and L Law Group, PLLC is a Frisco criminal-defense firm run by two Co-Founding Partners, Reggie London and Njeri London, who handle these cases personally. Frisco is a straight shot from Irving up the Dallas North Tollway and State Highway 114, and we are regularly in the Dallas County courts at Frank Crowley where Irving cases are heard. Rather than list generic promises, it is more useful to describe how we actually approach a sex-offense file — four commitments that track the stakes this page keeps naming: liberty, reputation, the registry, and, in Irving especially, the job, the clearance, and the immigration file.

We move before the arrest. Since the investigation is so often where these cases are quietly won or lost, we take clients on pre-arrest and pre-charge, stepping between them and the Irving detectives and CPS caseworkers, and shutting down the frightened, well-intentioned mistakes that wreck defenses before they start.

We refuse to take the State’s file on faith. Was the forensic interview conducted cleanly or suggestively? How and to whom did the outcry first come out? What did a SANE exam actually find, as opposed to assume? How were the phones and laptops seized, and how was the sting run? Every one of those is a seam where the prosecution’s proof can be tested against the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard, and we work each one.

We defend the whole life, not just the charge. This is the part that matters most to Irving clients. From the first meeting we map how a given charge or plea would ripple outward — onto sex-offender registration, immigration status, a security clearance or airport credential, a professional license, a parallel CPS case. For a teacher staring down an SBEC proceeding, a board-licensed professional, a green-card holder facing removal, an airport worker whose badge is pulled, or a parent whose custody is suddenly contested, those collateral outcomes can weigh as heavily as any prison term, and they shape strategy from day one.

We treat the people, not just the file. An accusation is not a verdict. The clients and families who call us are scared and are owed the presumption of innocence; what they get from us is candor about the road ahead, no guarantees about the outcome, and lawyers who pick up the phone at any hour. Consultations are free and confidential, and Spanish-speaking clients are served in their own language through our Spanish-language site. Whether you have already been charged in Irving or have only just heard that you are under investigation, the smartest first step is the same — talk to a lawyer. Reach us at (972) 370-5060.