Promotion of prostitution is a felony under Texas Penal Code § 43.03 — third degree at baseline, second degree with a prior conviction, and first degree when the conduct involves anyone under 18. Companion sections punish online promotion (§ 43.031) and aggravated promotion (§§ 43.04, 43.041). Below: the statute text, the four-section penalty grid, the elements the State must prove, defense strategies, and what to expect in Collin, Dallas, Denton, and Tarrant County courts.
Free, Confidential Case Review
Tell us what happened. A defense attorney reviews every submission — usually within the hour during business hours.
Published 2026-07-05 · Reviewed by Reggie London and Njeri London, Co-Founding Partners · Last reviewed: 2026-07-05
Peer Recognition
Martindale-Hubbell® 2026 Honors
Independent peer-review ratings recognizing legal ability and ethical standards.
Awards reflect peer-reviewed ratings only. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Controlling statutes:Tex. Penal Code § 43.03 (Promotion of Prostitution) · § 43.031 (Online Promotion) · § 43.04 (Aggravated Promotion) · § 43.041 (Aggravated Online Promotion) Classification: § 43.03 and § 43.031 — third-degree felony baseline; § 43.041 — second-degree felony baseline; § 43.04 — first-degree felony in every case Punishment range: third degree, 2–10 years TDCJ; second degree, 2–20 years; first degree, 5–99 years or life — each with a fine of up to $10,000 (Penal Code §§ 12.32–12.34)
What Is Promotion of Prostitution Under Texas Law?
Texans usually call it pimping or pandering. The Penal Code calls it promotion of prostitution, and it is written far more broadly than the street labels suggest. Section 43.03 reaches anyone who — acting other than as a prostitute being paid for their own services — knowingly does either of two things:
"(a) A person commits an offense if, acting other than as a prostitute receiving compensation for personally rendered prostitution services, he or she knowingly: (1) receives money or other property pursuant to an agreement to participate in the proceeds of prostitution; or (2) solicits another to engage in sexual conduct with another person for compensation."
The first prong is a proceeds theory: money or property changes hands under an agreement to share what prostitution brings in. The State does not have to prove you set up a single date — collecting, holding, or spending the money under a sharing arrangement is the conduct. The second prong is a solicitation-for-another theory, and its structure matters: the actor solicits one person to engage in sexual conduct with another person for compensation. That three-party shape is what separates promotion from ordinary prostitution and solicitation charges, which involve only a buyer and a seller.
Two definitions from § 43.01 stretch the statute further than most people expect. A "fee" means payment or an offer of payment "in the form of money, goods, services, or other benefit" — cash is not required. And "sexual conduct" covers sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, and sexual contact. Combined with the proceeds language of § 43.03(a)(1), the statute can reach roommates, partners, drivers, and money-holders whenever the State believes it can prove a knowing agreement to share prostitution income.
Note the carve-out in the first line: a person "acting … as a prostitute receiving compensation for personally rendered prostitution services" is not a promoter of their own services. That person's exposure is under § 43.02 (prostitution), a misdemeanor at baseline — not this felony. When two people work together and share expenses, the line between mutual assistance and a "proceeds agreement" becomes the whole case.
Online promotion of prostitution — § 43.031
The Legislature added § 43.031 in 2019 (S.B. 20), the year after Congress narrowed federal platform immunity for commercial-sex content. It targets a person who "owns, manages, or operates an interactive computer service or information content provider, or operates as an information content provider, with the intent to promote the prostitution of another person or facilitate another person to engage in prostitution or solicitation of prostitution." An "interactive computer service" is defined in § 43.01 to include essentially any multi-user information service or system that enables access to a computer server — websites, forums, apps, and hosted ad boards. The offense is a third-degree felony, raised to second degree by a prior conviction under § 43.031 or § 43.041 or when the conduct involves a person under 18 engaging in prostitution, regardless of whether the actor knew the age.
Aggravated promotion of prostitution — § 43.04
Promotion becomes aggravated promotion when the State alleges an enterprise. Under § 43.04, a person commits an offense "if he knowingly owns, invests in, finances, controls, supervises, or manages a prostitution enterprise that uses two or more prostitutes." Since September 1, 2019, this is a first-degree felony in every case — 5 to 99 years or life. There is no misdemeanor version, no third-degree fallback, and the two-prostitute threshold is low enough that the State routinely charges § 43.04 in cases most people would describe as small operations. Whether the proof actually shows an "enterprise" using two or more prostitutes — as opposed to isolated conduct — is a core defense battleground.
Aggravated online promotion — § 43.041
Section 43.041 is the enterprise-scale version of the online offense: owning, managing, or operating an interactive computer service with intent to promote the prostitution of five or more persons, or to facilitate five or more persons to engage in prostitution or solicitation. It is a second-degree felony, elevated to first degree by a prior § 43.041 conviction or when the conduct involves two or more persons under 18 engaging in prostitution — again regardless of knowledge of age.
What Are the Penalties for Promotion of Prostitution in Texas?
All four promotion offenses are felonies, and every enhancement in this cluster moves the case a full felony grade. The grid below states the law as verified against the current statute text:
1st-degree felony (prior § 43.041) — 5–99 yrs or life
1st-degree felony (2+ persons <18 engaging in prostitution)
Prison ranges come from Penal Code §§ 12.32–12.34: first-degree felonies carry life or 5 to 99 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, second-degree felonies 2 to 20 years, and third-degree felonies 2 to 10 years — each with an optional fine of up to $10,000. Habitual-offender enhancements under Chapter 12 can push the exposure higher still when the defendant has unrelated felony priors.
The grading history is one of the sharpest escalation stories in the Penal Code. Before September 1, 2019, baseline promotion was a state jail felony. S.B. 1802 (2019) lifted it to a third-degree felony, moved the prior-conviction variant to second degree, and made minor-involved promotion first degree — and the same bill made aggravated promotion a first-degree felony across the board. Then S.B. 1653 (2023), passed without a single no vote in either chamber, deleted the requirement that the under-18 person be "engaging in prostitution" — so § 43.03 now hits first-degree range whenever the proceeds or solicitation conduct involves anyone under 18, even if no commercial sex act by the minor is ever proved. A charge that was a state jail felony six years ago can now read 5-to-life on the indictment.
Elements the State Must Prove
Conviction requires proof of every element beyond a reasonable doubt. The two § 43.03 theories break down differently:
Proceeds theory — § 43.03(a)(1)
(1) the defendant received money or other property; (2) the receipt was pursuant to an agreement to participate in the proceeds of prostitution; (3) the defendant acted knowingly — aware of the nature of the arrangement (Penal Code § 6.03(b)); and (4) the defendant was not simply a prostitute being compensated for personally rendered services. The agreement is the load-bearing element: receiving money from someone who happens to earn it through prostitution, without a sharing agreement, is not this offense.
Solicitation theory — § 43.03(a)(2)
(1) the defendant solicited another person; (2) the solicitation was for that person to engage in sexual conduct with a third person; (3) the sexual conduct was to be exchanged for compensation; and (4) the defendant acted knowingly. If the alleged deal runs only between two people — one paying, one performing — the conduct belongs to § 43.02 or § 43.021, not § 43.03.
Grade-raising facts
To reach second- or first-degree range, the State must additionally prove the prior conviction or that the conduct involved a person under 18. Age-involvement carries no knowledge requirement — the statute says "regardless of whether the actor knows the age of the person" — so the fight is over whether the conduct involved the minor at all, not over what the defendant believed.
For § 43.04, the State must prove the defendant knowingly owned, invested in, financed, controlled, supervised, or managed a prostitution enterprise that used two or more prostitutes. Each of those words is an element. A defendant who books their own dates alongside one other person, with no management structure, has a strong argument that no "enterprise" used two prostitutes within the statute's meaning.
How Is Promotion Different from Prostitution, Solicitation, Compelling, and Trafficking?
Chapter 43 builds a ladder, and prosecutors pick the rung. Knowing where § 43.03 sits — and where the State may try to move the case — matters from the first bond hearing:
Consent and free agency are the fault lines. Promotion assumes the person engaged in prostitution acted voluntarily; compelling and trafficking allege the defendant caused it — by force, threat, coercion, fraud, or, for minors and disabled individuals, by any means at all. One verified detail worth knowing: § 43.02(d) gives the person engaged in prostitution a defense when they acted because they were a victim of trafficking or compelling — a provision that changes who cooperates with the State, and against whom.
The trafficking-overlap risk is real. The same evidence that supports a § 43.03 proceeds count — ads placed, rides given, rooms rented, money collected — is frequently re-packaged as trafficking under Chapter 20A, which carries its own, generally harsher, punishment structure and, for continuous trafficking, stacked exposure. Defense counsel's first structural job in a promotion case is often keeping it a promotion case.
How Do Online Promotion Cases Work?
Sections 43.031 and 43.041 shifted Texas enforcement from the street to the server. Charges have followed hosted ad boards, "review" forums, subscription sites, and social-media accounts that coordinate commercial sex for others. The elements track ownership, management, or operation of the service plus intent — so these prosecutions are built on business records: domain registrations, hosting and payment-processor accounts, moderator logs, direct messages, and cash-app flows.
Two features make the online sections dangerous. First, "facilitate" reaches conduct well short of running an escort service — the State reads it to cover platforms that merely make prostitution or solicitation easier, leaving intent as the main limiting element. Second, the jump from § 43.031 to § 43.041 turns on a number (five or more persons promoted or facilitated), and the State's counting method — profiles? posters? unique individuals proved? — is a live defense issue. Attribution is the other pressure point: proving who actually operated an account or service, as opposed to who once logged in, is a forensic question, and shared credentials, spoofed registrations, and multi-admin platforms give the defense room to work.
How Do Sting Operations Lead to Promotion Charges?
Most Chapter 43 arrests in North Texas come out of planned operations rather than complaints. Vice units post decoy advertisements, respond to existing ads, arrange meetings at hotels, and record calls and messages. Buyer-side stings generate § 43.021 arrests; promotion cases grow from the follow-on investigation — who placed the ad, whose number the money went to, who rented the room, who drove. Phones seized at the scene are searched under warrants, and extraction reports often become the State's core exhibit.
Entrapment is the first defense clients raise and the most misunderstood. Under Penal Code § 8.06, it is a defense that the actor was induced to commit the offense by law-enforcement persuasion "likely to cause persons to commit the offense" — but the statute says flatly that "conduct merely affording a person an opportunity to commit an offense does not constitute entrapment." An undercover officer posing as a willing participant is opportunity, not inducement. Entrapment has teeth only where officers manufactured the crime through pressure a law-abiding person would not resist — repeated refusals overcome, threats, or exploitation of a relationship.
What Defenses Work Against a Promotion of Prostitution Charge?
The right theory depends on which subsection is charged and how the evidence was built. Defense strategies we develop in § 43.03–§ 43.041 cases include:
No proceeds agreement. Section 43.03(a)(1) requires receipt of money or property pursuant to an agreement to participate in the proceeds. Shared rent, gifts, repaid loans, and ordinary household finances between partners or roommates are not automatically a criminal agreement — the State must prove the arrangement, not merely the cash flow.
The personal-services carve-out. A person compensated for their own prostitution services is expressly outside § 43.03. Where the State stretches a § 43.02 situation into a felony promotion count, the statute's own opening clause is the answer.
Wrong offense structure. The solicitation prong needs three parties — solicitor, solicited person, and the third person who would pay or be served. Two-party facts belong in the misdemeanor and state-jail lanes of §§ 43.02 and 43.021, not in § 43.03.
No knowledge. "Knowingly" under § 6.03(b) means awareness of the nature of the conduct. Drivers, landlords, front-desk staff, and web administrators can move money or provide services without knowing what the money represents.
Entrapment. Where officers went beyond opportunity into active inducement, § 8.06 supplies a defense the jury must be charged on.
Accomplice-witness attacks — used correctly. Promotion cases are usually built on the testimony of participants. Two statutes govern: § 43.06 lets the State compel a party to testify and gives that party use immunity, and § 43.06(d) says a conviction "may be had upon the uncorroborated testimony of a party to the offense" — an express carve-out from the general corroboration rule of Code of Criminal Procedure article 38.14. The defense play is therefore credibility, not admissibility: immunity motives, charge deals, inconsistent statements, and the absence of the corroboration a careful jury expects even when the law does not require it.
Suppression. Phone extractions, room searches, and platform records all depend on warrants and their scope. Evidence obtained illegally is excluded under Code of Criminal Procedure article 38.23, and proceeds counts often collapse without the digital money trail.
Attribution failure (online counts). Ownership or operation of a service must be tied to the defendant personally — shared logins, resold accounts, and multi-admin boards create reasonable doubt about who "operated" anything.
Fighting the aggravation. For § 43.04, hold the State to "enterprise" and "uses two or more prostitutes"; for § 43.041, to the five-person threshold. Beating the aggravating element can move a case from 5-to-life down to the 2-to-10 range — often the single highest-value fight in the case.
Enhancements & Collateral Consequences
The in-statute enhancements are described above: prior convictions raise §§ 43.03, 43.031, and 43.041 by one grade, and minor involvement raises § 43.03 to first degree and § 43.031 to second — with no knowledge-of-age requirement anywhere in the cluster. Chapter 12 habitual-felony enhancements stack on top for defendants with prior felony convictions from any chapter.
The consequences that follow the sentence are just as serious:
Sex-offender registration. S.B. 1802 (2019) added aggravated promotion of prostitution (§ 43.04) to the reportable-conviction list in Code of Criminal Procedure article 62.001(5). Baseline § 43.03 promotion is not on that enumerated list, but compelling prostitution and the trafficking offenses that so often ride alongside promotion counts are — and the list changes session to session, so any plea must be checked against the current article 62.001 text.
Immigration. Federal law classifies offenses relating to "the owning, controlling, managing, or supervising of a prostitution business" as aggravated felonies, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(K)(i). For non-citizens, a § 43.04 plea — and depending on the record, a § 43.03 plea — can mean near-certain removal and permanent inadmissibility.
Firearms. Any felony conviction triggers the Texas possession bar of Penal Code § 46.04 and the federal lifetime bar of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
Asset forfeiture. Texas contraband-forfeiture law (Code of Criminal Procedure chapter 59) lets the State pursue money and property it contends are proceeds of, or were used to commit, enumerated felonies — and prosecutors commonly file a parallel civil forfeiture action against cash, vehicles, and accounts seized in promotion investigations.
Probation and deferred-adjudication limits. Community-supervision eligibility under Code of Criminal Procedure chapter 42A narrows sharply for first-degree and child-involved variants; eligibility has to be mapped to the exact subsection and enhancement alleged before any plea decision.
Licensing and employment. A crime-of-moral-turpitude felony conviction reaches professional licenses through Occupations Code chapter 53 fitness review, and shows on every standard background check for employment and housing.
What Happens After a Promotion of Prostitution Arrest? — Case Timeline
Arrests usually come one of two ways: on the spot during an operation, or by warrant weeks later after phones and platform records are analyzed. Either way the case follows the Texas felony track: magistration within about 48 hours (Code of Criminal Procedure article 15.17), where bond and conditions are set; grand-jury indictment, since every promotion offense is a felony; discovery under article 39.14, which obligates the State to produce offense reports, extraction reports, ad-platform returns, and witness statements; pretrial motions — suppression, quash, and election fights over which subsection and which enhancement the State must commit to; and resolution by dismissal, reduction, plea, or trial. Bond conditions in these cases frequently include device and internet restrictions, so getting conditions right at magistration has immediate practical stakes.
Hypothetical example (illustrative only): a Plano man lets his girlfriend use his spare phone to post ads and deposits her earnings into his account "to keep it safe," keeping part of each deposit for rent by agreement. On those facts the State would argue § 43.03(a)(1) — knowing receipt under a proceeds agreement. His defense would target the agreement element and his knowledge, and the difference between shared living expenses and participation in proceeds.
Second hypothetical: a web developer moderates a members-only forum where posters "review" providers and coordinate meetings across DFW. If the State proves he operated the board intending to facilitate prostitution for five or more persons, the exposure is § 43.041 — second degree — before any minor-involvement allegation. His defenses live in intent, attribution, and the five-person count.
County-by-County Practice Notes
L and L Law Group defends promotion cases from one office — 5899 Preston Rd, Suite 101, Frisco — across the four core DFW counties:
Collin County. Felony promotion cases are indicted by the Collin County grand jury and heard in the district courts at the Collin County Courthouse (Russell A. Steindam Courts Building), 2100 Bloomdale Rd, McKinney. Cases here often originate with Frisco, Plano, McKinney, and Allen police operations along the US-75 and Sam Rayburn corridors.
Dallas County. Felonies are heard at the Frank Crowley Courts Building in Dallas. Multi-agency operations are common, and Dallas cases more often arrive with parallel federal interest when platforms or interstate travel are involved.
Tarrant County. District courts sit at the Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center in Fort Worth. Tarrant prosecutors routinely pair promotion counts with trafficking investigation referrals, which makes early charge-framing work especially valuable.
Denton County. Felony cases are heard at the Denton County Courts Building in Denton, with arrests frequently generated along the I-35E corridor from Lewisville through Denton.
These are general practice observations about where and how cases are filed — every case turns on its own facts, agency, and court assignment.
Key Legal Terms
Promotion of Prostitution (§ 43.03)
Knowingly receiving money or other property under an agreement to participate in prostitution proceeds, or soliciting one person to engage in sexual conduct with another for compensation; third-degree felony at baseline.
Prostitution Enterprise (§ 43.04)
The aggravated offense requires an enterprise that "uses two or more prostitutes" — owned, invested in, financed, controlled, supervised, or managed by the defendant. First-degree felony in every case since 2019.
Interactive Computer Service (§ 43.01(1-d))
Any information service or system enabling multi-user access to a computer server — the platform element of the online promotion offenses in §§ 43.031 and 43.041.
Fee (§ 43.01(1-b))
Payment or offer of payment in money, goods, services, or other benefit — commercial-sex compensation does not have to be cash.
Accomplice Witness Rule (§ 43.06)
A party to a prostitution-subchapter offense can be compelled to testify, receives use immunity, and — unlike in most Texas felony trials — the conviction may rest on that party's uncorroborated testimony.
Regardless-of-Age Liability
Every minor-involvement enhancement in the promotion cluster applies "regardless of whether the actor knows the age of the person" — a mistaken or reasonable belief about age is not a defense to the grade increase.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is promotion of prostitution a felony in Texas?
Yes — every promotion offense in Texas is a felony. Baseline promotion under Penal Code § 43.03 is a third-degree felony carrying 2 to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. A prior conviction raises it to a second-degree felony, and conduct involving a person under 18 makes it a first-degree felony.
Is promotion of prostitution the same thing as pimping?
Pimping is the street name; § 43.03 is the statute. Texas law reaches two things: receiving money or property under an agreement to share prostitution proceeds, and soliciting one person to engage in sexual conduct with another for compensation. Prosecutors do not have to prove a stereotypical pimp relationship — a single proceeds agreement can be enough.
Can I be charged for driving someone to appointments or holding their money?
Possibly, if the State can prove a knowing agreement to share prostitution proceeds. Accepting gas money is not automatically a crime; the statute requires that money change hands pursuant to an agreement to participate in the proceeds. Whether an agreement existed — and whether you knew what the money represented — is usually the central fight in these cases.
What if I did not know the person was under 18?
Not knowing the age is not a defense to the enhancement. Section 43.03(b)(2) applies “regardless of whether the actor knows the age of the person at the time of the offense,” making promotion involving anyone under 18 a first-degree felony. The same regardless-of-age language appears in the online and aggravated online statutes.
How is promotion of prostitution different from sex trafficking?
Promotion punishes profiting from or facilitating prostitution; trafficking under Penal Code § 20A.02 punishes causing another person to engage in commercial sex through trafficking conduct. The same facts — recruiting, transporting, advertising, collecting money — often support both charges, and prosecutors frequently file them together. Trafficking carries its own, generally harsher, punishment structure.
What is online promotion of prostitution under § 43.031?
Online promotion targets people who own, manage, or operate a website, app, or other interactive computer service with intent to promote prostitution or facilitate prostitution or solicitation. Enacted in 2019, § 43.031 is a third-degree felony — second degree with a prior conviction or where a person under 18 engaging in prostitution is involved.
Does a promotion of prostitution conviction require sex-offender registration?
Aggravated promotion under § 43.04 does — the 2019 law S.B. 1802 added it to the reportable-conviction list in Code of Criminal Procedure article 62.001(5). Baseline § 43.03 promotion is not on that enumerated list, but registration law changes session to session and overlapping charges such as compelling prostitution and trafficking do carry registration, so eligibility must be confirmed against the current statute before any plea.
Can I be convicted on the word of the person I allegedly promoted?
Yes — and this surprises people. Penal Code § 43.06(d) says a conviction under this subchapter “may be had upon the uncorroborated testimony of a party to the offense,” an express carve-out from the usual accomplice-corroboration rule in Code of Criminal Procedure article 38.14. The defense response is to attack credibility, immunity deals, and inconsistencies rather than admissibility.
What should I do after an arrest for promotion of prostitution?
Say nothing about the case and get counsel involved before your first court setting. Invoke your right to remain silent, do not consent to phone searches, preserve your own records, and follow every bond condition. Early defense work — before indictment — is when charge reduction and grand-jury presentations are most realistic.
Can a promotion of prostitution case be dismissed or sealed?
Dismissals happen when the State cannot prove the proceeds agreement or solicitation element, when key testimony collapses, or when searches are suppressed. If the case ends in acquittal or dismissal, expunction may be available; a conviction cannot be expunged. Record sealing after deferred adjudication is fact-specific and depends on the exact subsection and current eligibility statutes.
Reggie London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on federal criminal defense, complex felony defense, and TEA/SBEC matters. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.
Njeri London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on DWI defense, family violence cases, and juvenile defense. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.
Charged with Promotion of Prostitution? Talk to L and L Law Group.
Co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London personally handle every case. Free consultation. Frisco, Texas.
L&L Law Group represents clients across North Texas counties for DWI, assault, drug crimes, juvenile defense, outstanding warrants, bond reduction, and expunction matters.
