☎ Call Today Free Consult
Criminal Defense • Frisco, Texas
Serving 9 DFW Counties — Collin • Dallas • Denton • Tarrant • Rockwall • Kaufman • Ellis • Johnson • Hunt — Available 24/7
The L and L Law Group team at our Frisco, Texas office — co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London with staff
Our Frisco officeEst. 2011
The L and L Law Group team·Frisco, Texas

Texas taking or attempting to take weapon from peace officer

Texas taking or attempting to take weapon from peace officer is a criminal offense under Penal Code § 38.14. Base conduct is classified as a third-degree felony; enhancements and aggravators can move the punishment range higher. Below: the controlling statute text, the full punishment range, common defense theories, and what to do if you have been charged in Collin, Dallas, Denton, or Tarrant County.

Published 2026-05-15 · Reviewed by Reggie London and Njeri London, Co-Founding Partners · Last reviewed: 2026-05-15
Controlling statute: Texas § 38.14
Classification: Third-degree felony
Punishment range: Third-degree felony (2–10 years + $10,000 fine) under § 12.34

The controlling statute

Texas Penal Code § 38.14 makes it a third-degree felony to intentionally or knowingly, and with force, take or attempt to take a firearm, nightstick, stun gun, or personal protection chemical dispensing device from a peace officer, federal special investigator, employee of a correctional facility, or other defined officials. The statute creates substantial exposure for any physical struggle during an arrest in which the defendant reaches for an officer's weapon — even unsuccessful attempts trigger the full felony penalty. The law was designed to deter and severely punish disarmament attempts that endanger officers and the public.

Classification & punishment range

ElementDetail
StatuteTexas § 38.14
ClusterObstruction of Justice
ClassificationThird-degree felony
RangeThird-degree felony (2–10 years + $10,000 fine) under § 12.34
Last reviewed2026-05-15

Elements the State must prove

To convict on a Texas § 38.14 charge, the State must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. Defendant intentionally or knowingly attempted to take or took a weapon
  2. The weapon was a firearm, nightstick, stun gun, or chemical dispensing device
  3. The weapon was from the person or immediate presence of a peace officer
  4. Defendant acted with force

Defense strategies

L and L Law Group, PLLC develops the following defense strategies on every Taking or Attempting to Take Weapon from Peace Officer case:

Enhancements & collateral consequences

Already a third-degree felony; stacked charges under § 22.01 (Assault on Public Servant — third-degree felony), § 22.02 (Aggravated Assault — second-degree felony when deadly weapon used), and § 38.04 (Evading Arrest) are routine. Parallel federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Assaulting Federal Officer) common when federal agents are involved. Use of the taken weapon to harm anyone elevates to attempted murder or aggravated assault.

Key Legal Terms

Force
Physical effort applied to separate the weapon from officer's control — touching alone insufficient; resistance must be directed at weapon, not merely officer.
Peace Officer (§ 1.07(a)(36))
Officers commissioned under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 2.12 — including police, sheriffs, DPS troopers, federal special investigators with state commission.
18 U.S.C. § 111
Federal Assaulting Federal Officer statute; parallel exposure when victim is federal agent — up to 20 years for use of weapon.

Frequently Asked Questions

What counts as 'force' under § 38.14?
Force is any physical effort directed at separating the weapon from the officer's control — grabbing, pulling, twisting, or otherwise applying physical resistance. Touching the weapon without force does not satisfy the statute; the State must prove physical effort, however brief.
Does pulling away from an officer count?
Pulling away to escape an arrest is typically charged under § 38.03 (Resisting Arrest) — a Class A misdemeanor — not § 38.14. The disarmament statute requires effort directed at the weapon itself, not just resistance to physical control. The distinction is fact-intensive.
What if I didn't know the person was an officer?
Knowledge of officer status is implicit in § 38.14. Mistake of fact about identity can be a defense in undercover or plainclothes situations, but uniformed officers and marked vehicles establish notice that defeats most mistake defenses.
Is reaching for an officer's gun automatic § 38.14?
Reaching with intent to take is sufficient; actually grasping the weapon is not required for the attempt branch. Body-camera footage and officer testimony about the trajectory and intent of the hand movement drive these cases.
Will federal charges follow?
If the officer was a federal agent — DEA, FBI, ATF, U.S. Marshal — federal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 111 is likely. Federal penalties can reach 20 years for assault on federal officers; state and federal charges can run consecutively under the separate-sovereigns doctrine.

References & Authoritative Sources

  1. Texas § 38.14
  2. Texas CCP Chapter 42A — Community Supervision
  3. Texas Courts
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety
  5. Texas State Law Library

About the Authors

Reggie London

Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043514

Reggie London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on federal criminal defense, complex felony defense, and TEA/SBEC matters. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.

Njeri London

Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043266

Njeri London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on DWI defense, family violence cases, and juvenile defense. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.

Charged with Taking or Attempting to Take Weapon from Peace Officer? Talk to L and L Law Group.

Co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London personally handle every case. Free consultation. Frisco, Texas.

Call (972) 370-5060

Service Areas

L&L Law Group represents clients across North Texas counties for DWI, assault, drug crimes, juvenile defense, outstanding warrants, bond reduction, and expunction matters.

Call Email Map Top
developed by MPR Digital Legal Services