Texas cyberstalking and electronic harassment — Penal Code § 42.07
Texas cyberstalking and electronic harassment is a criminal offense under Penal Code § 42.07. Base conduct is classified as a Class B misdemeanor; enhancements, value tiers, or aggravators can move the classification up to felony exposure. Below: the controlling statute text, the full punishment range, common defense theories, and what to do if you have been charged in Collin, Dallas, Denton, or Tarrant County.
Classification: Class B misdemeanor; Class A misdemeanor for repeat offenders
Punishment range: Class B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in county jail + $2,000 fine) under § 12.22; Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year + $4,000 fine) under § 12.21 when committed against a prior § 42.07 victim or violating a protective order
The controlling statute
Texas Penal Code § 42.07 criminalizes harassment by electronic communications — text messages, social media direct messages, email, repeated phone calls, and other digital contact — when made with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another. The statute was upheld against a First Amendment challenge in Ex parte Barton (2021), confirming its application to repeated, unwanted electronic contact even when individual messages are not obscene or threatening.
Classification & punishment range
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Statute | Texas § 42.07 |
| Cluster | Violent Crimes |
| Classification | Class B misdemeanor; Class A misdemeanor for repeat offenders |
| Range | Class B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in county jail + $2,000 fine) under § 12.22; Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year + $4,000 fine) under § 12.21 when committed against a prior § 42.07 victim or violating a protective order |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-15 |
Elements the State must prove
To convict on a Texas § 42.07 charge, the State must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt:
- Defendant engaged in conduct described by § 42.07(a) — repeated electronic communications, threats, false reports, or anonymous calls
- Conduct was directed at another specific person
- Defendant acted with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass
- Communications occurred in a manner reasonably likely to harass that person
Defense strategies
L and L Law Group, PLLC develops the following defense strategies on every Cyberstalking and Electronic Harassment case:
- Lack of harassment intent under § 42.07(a) — communications were for a legitimate purpose (debt collection, journalism, advocacy)
- First Amendment challenge as applied — single message of public concern is constitutionally protected
- Constitutional vagueness or overbreadth challenge per Wilson v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 2021)
- Mistaken identity — account spoofing or shared device argued with forensic support
- Consent or invitation — recipient invited the contact, contradicting the alarm element
- Suppression of digital evidence obtained without a search warrant under CCP Art. 18.02
Enhancements & collateral consequences
Section 42.07(c) elevates to a Class A misdemeanor when the defendant has been previously convicted of § 42.07 against the same victim or violated a § 25.07 protective order. Where the conduct also satisfies § 42.072 stalking — repeated harassment causing fear — the offense becomes a 3rd-degree felony. Federal cyberstalking under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A can run consecutively when conduct crosses state lines.
Key Legal Terms
- Harassment Intent (§ 42.07(a))
- Specific intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another person; communications for legitimate purposes do not qualify.
- Electronic Communication (§ 42.07(b)(1))
- Transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence transmitted by wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo-optical system.
- Reasonably Likely to Harass
- Objective standard asking whether the communications would harass, annoy, or alarm a reasonable person under similar circumstances, considering volume, content, and context.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is texting an ex repeatedly a crime in Texas?
Does blocking someone count as evidence that further contact is harassment?
What is the difference between harassment and stalking?
Is sending one angry email a crime?
Will text messages be subpoenaed from the phone company?
References & Authoritative Sources
About the Authors
Reggie London
Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043514
Reggie London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on federal criminal defense, complex felony defense, and TEA/SBEC matters. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.
Njeri London
Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043266
Njeri London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on DWI defense, family violence cases, and juvenile defense. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.
Charged with Cyberstalking and Electronic Harassment? Talk to L and L Law Group.
Co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London personally handle every case. Free consultation. Frisco, Texas.
Call (972) 370-5060