☎ Call Today Free Consult
Criminal Defense • Frisco, Texas
Serving 9 DFW Counties — Collin • Dallas • Denton • Tarrant • Rockwall • Kaufman • Ellis • Johnson • Hunt — Available 24/7
The L and L Law Group team at our Frisco, Texas office — co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London with staff
Our Frisco officeEst. 2011
The L and L Law Group team·Frisco, Texas

Texas cyberstalking and electronic harassment — Penal Code § 42.07

Texas cyberstalking and electronic harassment is a criminal offense under Penal Code § 42.07. Base conduct is classified as a Class B misdemeanor; enhancements, value tiers, or aggravators can move the classification up to felony exposure. Below: the controlling statute text, the full punishment range, common defense theories, and what to do if you have been charged in Collin, Dallas, Denton, or Tarrant County.

Published 2026-05-15 · Reviewed by Reggie London and Njeri London, Co-Founding Partners · Last reviewed: 2026-05-15
Controlling statute: Texas § 42.07
Classification: Class B misdemeanor; Class A misdemeanor for repeat offenders
Punishment range: Class B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in county jail + $2,000 fine) under § 12.22; Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year + $4,000 fine) under § 12.21 when committed against a prior § 42.07 victim or violating a protective order

The controlling statute

Texas Penal Code § 42.07 criminalizes harassment by electronic communications — text messages, social media direct messages, email, repeated phone calls, and other digital contact — when made with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another. The statute was upheld against a First Amendment challenge in Ex parte Barton (2021), confirming its application to repeated, unwanted electronic contact even when individual messages are not obscene or threatening.

Classification & punishment range

ElementDetail
StatuteTexas § 42.07
ClusterViolent Crimes
ClassificationClass B misdemeanor; Class A misdemeanor for repeat offenders
RangeClass B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in county jail + $2,000 fine) under § 12.22; Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year + $4,000 fine) under § 12.21 when committed against a prior § 42.07 victim or violating a protective order
Last reviewed2026-05-15

Elements the State must prove

To convict on a Texas § 42.07 charge, the State must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. Defendant engaged in conduct described by § 42.07(a) — repeated electronic communications, threats, false reports, or anonymous calls
  2. Conduct was directed at another specific person
  3. Defendant acted with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass
  4. Communications occurred in a manner reasonably likely to harass that person

Defense strategies

L and L Law Group, PLLC develops the following defense strategies on every Cyberstalking and Electronic Harassment case:

Enhancements & collateral consequences

Section 42.07(c) elevates to a Class A misdemeanor when the defendant has been previously convicted of § 42.07 against the same victim or violated a § 25.07 protective order. Where the conduct also satisfies § 42.072 stalking — repeated harassment causing fear — the offense becomes a 3rd-degree felony. Federal cyberstalking under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A can run consecutively when conduct crosses state lines.

Key Legal Terms

Harassment Intent (§ 42.07(a))
Specific intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another person; communications for legitimate purposes do not qualify.
Electronic Communication (§ 42.07(b)(1))
Transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence transmitted by wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo-optical system.
Reasonably Likely to Harass
Objective standard asking whether the communications would harass, annoy, or alarm a reasonable person under similar circumstances, considering volume, content, and context.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is texting an ex repeatedly a crime in Texas?
It can be. Texas § 42.07(a)(7) makes it a Class B misdemeanor to send repeated electronic communications in a manner likely to harass, annoy, or alarm — even if individual messages are not threatening. Courts focus on volume, persistence, and the recipient's expressed wish to be left alone.
Does blocking someone count as evidence that further contact is harassment?
Yes. Texas courts treat clear notice — including blocking, restraining-order language, or explicit 'do not contact' messages — as strong evidence that subsequent contact was made with knowledge it would harass. Workarounds via new numbers or accounts compound liability.
What is the difference between harassment and stalking?
Section 42.07 harassment targets isolated incidents or repeated contact intended to harass. Section 42.072 stalking requires repeated conduct that on more than one occasion causes the victim to fear bodily injury, death, property damage, or feel harassed under a reasonable-person standard.
Is sending one angry email a crime?
Generally no. Section 42.07(a)(7) requires 'repeated' electronic communications. A single email — even if profane or insulting — usually does not satisfy the statute. Threats or invasive content in a single message may support different charges under § 22.07 (terroristic threat) or § 21.16 (unlawful disclosure of intimate visual material).
Will text messages be subpoenaed from the phone company?
Possibly. Carriers retain SMS content for limited periods. The State typically obtains a CCP Art. 18.21 court order for content. iMessage and encrypted apps require device-level forensic extraction, often through a separate Apple or device-targeted warrant. Defense should preserve metadata on the client's device.

References & Authoritative Sources

  1. Texas § 42.07
  2. Texas CCP Chapter 42A — Community Supervision
  3. Texas Courts
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety
  5. Texas State Law Library

About the Authors

Reggie London

Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043514

Reggie London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on federal criminal defense, complex felony defense, and TEA/SBEC matters. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.

Njeri London

Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043266

Njeri London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on DWI defense, family violence cases, and juvenile defense. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.

Charged with Cyberstalking and Electronic Harassment? Talk to L and L Law Group.

Co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London personally handle every case. Free consultation. Frisco, Texas.

Call (972) 370-5060

Service Areas

L&L Law Group represents clients across North Texas counties for DWI, assault, drug crimes, juvenile defense, outstanding warrants, bond reduction, and expunction matters.

Call Email Map Top
developed by MPR Digital Legal Services