Texas cyberstalking and electronic harassment — Penal Code § 42.07
Texas cyberstalking and electronic harassment is a criminal offense under Penal Code § 42.07. Base conduct is classified as a Class B misdemeanor; enhancements, value tiers, or aggravators can move the classification up to felony exposure. Below: the controlling statute text, the full punishment range, common defense theories, and what to do if you have been charged in Collin, Dallas, Denton, or Tarrant County.
Free, Confidential Case Review
Tell us what happened. A defense attorney reviews every submission — usually within the hour during business hours.
Classification: Class B misdemeanor; Class A misdemeanor for repeat offenders
Punishment range: Class B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in county jail + $2,000 fine) under § 12.22; Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year + $4,000 fine) under § 12.21 when committed against a prior § 42.07 victim or violating a protective order
The controlling statute
Texas Penal Code § 42.07 criminalizes harassment by electronic communications — text messages, social media direct messages, email, repeated phone calls, and other digital contact — when made with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another. The statute was upheld against a First Amendment challenge in Ex parte Barton (2021), confirming its application to repeated, unwanted electronic contact even when individual messages are not obscene or threatening.
Classification & punishment range
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Statute | Texas § 42.07 |
| Cluster | Violent Crimes |
| Classification | Class B misdemeanor; Class A misdemeanor for repeat offenders |
| Range | Class B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in county jail + $2,000 fine) under § 12.22; Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year + $4,000 fine) under § 12.21 when committed against a prior § 42.07 victim or violating a protective order |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-15 |
Elements the State must prove
To convict on a Texas § 42.07 charge, the State must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt:
- Defendant engaged in conduct described by § 42.07(a) — repeated electronic communications, threats, false reports, or anonymous calls
- Conduct was directed at another specific person
- Defendant acted with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass
- Communications occurred in a manner reasonably likely to harass that person
Defense strategies
L and L Law Group, PLLC develops the following defense strategies on every Cyberstalking and Electronic Harassment case:
- Lack of harassment intent under § 42.07(a) — communications were for a legitimate purpose (debt collection, journalism, advocacy)
- First Amendment challenge as applied — single message of public concern is constitutionally protected
- Constitutional vagueness or overbreadth challenge per Wilson v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 2021)
- Mistaken identity — account spoofing or shared device argued with forensic support
- Consent or invitation — recipient invited the contact, contradicting the alarm element
- Suppression of digital evidence obtained without a search warrant under CCP Art. 18.02
Enhancements & collateral consequences
Section 42.07(c) elevates to a Class A misdemeanor when the defendant has been previously convicted of § 42.07 against the same victim or violated a § 25.07 protective order. Where the conduct also satisfies § 42.072 stalking — repeated harassment causing fear — the offense becomes a 3rd-degree felony. Federal cyberstalking under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A can run consecutively when conduct crosses state lines.
Key Legal Terms
- Harassment Intent (§ 42.07(a))
- Specific intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another person; communications for legitimate purposes do not qualify.
- Electronic Communication (§ 42.07(b)(1))
- Transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence transmitted by wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo-optical system.
- Reasonably Likely to Harass
- Objective standard asking whether the communications would harass, annoy, or alarm a reasonable person under similar circumstances, considering volume, content, and context.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is texting an ex repeatedly a crime in Texas?
Does blocking someone count as evidence that further contact is harassment?
What is the difference between harassment and stalking?
Is sending one angry email a crime?
Will text messages be subpoenaed from the phone company?
References & Authoritative Sources
About the Authors
Reggie London
Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043514
Reggie London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on federal criminal defense, complex felony defense, and TEA/SBEC matters. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.
Njeri London
Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043266
Njeri London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on DWI defense, family violence cases, and juvenile defense. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.
Charged with Cyberstalking and Electronic Harassment? Talk to L and L Law Group.
Co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London personally handle every case. Free consultation. Frisco, Texas.
Call (972) 370-5060