Texas arrest warrant requirements — CCP Art. 15.04
Texas arrest warrant requirements are governed by Code of Criminal Procedure Article 15.04. The rules define the State's required steps, the defendant's rights at this stage, and the consequences of noncompliance. Below: the statutory text, the standard of practice in Collin, Dallas, Denton, and Tarrant Counties, and what a defendant should know before this stage.
Classification: Pretrial procedural requirement
Punishment range: Warrant issues upon sworn affidavit; valid until executed or recalled by court
The controlling statute
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 15.04 governs the issuance of arrest warrants. A magistrate may issue an arrest warrant only upon a sworn complaint or affidavit establishing probable cause that a specific person committed a particular offense. The affidavit must contain sworn facts — not conclusions — and must particularly describe the person to be seized and the offense. Defective warrants are subject to suppression under Article 38.23, and statements or evidence flowing from an unlawful arrest may be excluded from trial.
Classification & punishment range
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Statute | Texas CCP Art. 15.04 |
| Cluster | Criminal Procedure |
| Classification | Pretrial procedural requirement |
| Range | Warrant issues upon sworn affidavit; valid until executed or recalled by court |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-15 |
Elements the State must prove
To convict on a Texas CCP Art. 15.04 charge, the State must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt:
- Sworn complaint or affidavit filed with a neutral magistrate
- Affidavit states facts establishing probable cause that an offense was committed
- Affidavit identifies the accused with reasonable particularity
- Magistrate makes an independent probable-cause determination
- Warrant issued in writing, signed by magistrate, and naming the offense
Defense strategies
L and L Law Group, PLLC develops the following defense strategies on every Arrest Warrant Requirements case:
- Challenge probable cause as conclusory or based solely on uncorroborated informant tips under Aguilar-Spinelli/Illinois v. Gates
- Attack particularity — the warrant fails to identify the accused or the offense with sufficient specificity
- Show the affidavit contains material false statements made knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth (Franks v. Delaware)
- Demonstrate the magistrate was not neutral and detached or acted as a rubber stamp
- Move to suppress all fruits of the illegal arrest under CCP Art. 38.23 and the Fourth Amendment
- Argue the four corners of the affidavit fail to provide a substantial basis for probable cause
Enhancements & collateral consequences
An invalid arrest warrant taints subsequent searches, statements, and identifications, triggering suppression under Article 38.23. Issuance by a non-neutral magistrate, omissions of material exculpatory facts, or warrants based on stale information may invalidate the entire prosecution. Capias warrants (post-indictment) follow related but distinct procedures under Article 23.03.
Key Legal Terms
- Probable Cause
- A reasonable basis, based on sworn facts and circumstances, to believe a specific person committed a specific offense.
- Particularity
- Fourth Amendment requirement that the warrant identify the person to be seized and the offense with enough detail to avoid general or arbitrary arrests.
- Franks Hearing
- Evidentiary hearing under Franks v. Delaware testing whether the warrant affidavit contains material falsehoods made intentionally or recklessly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a Texas arrest warrant affidavit contain?
Can a Texas arrest warrant be challenged after arrest?
What is a Franks hearing in Texas?
How long is a Texas arrest warrant valid?
Can police arrest without a warrant in Texas?
References & Authoritative Sources
About the Authors
Reggie London
Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043514
Reggie London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on federal criminal defense, complex felony defense, and TEA/SBEC matters. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.
Njeri London
Co-Founding Partner · Texas Bar No. 24043266
Njeri London co-founded L and L Law Group with a focus on DWI defense, family violence cases, and juvenile defense. Licensed in Texas, admitted to TXND and TXED.
Charged with Arrest Warrant Requirements? Talk to L and L Law Group.
Co-founding partners Reggie London and Njeri London personally handle every case. Free consultation. Frisco, Texas.
Call (972) 370-5060