Phase 1 — Intake and Source
Section summaryAn SBEC matter begins when TEA Educator Investigations receives a referral. The most common sources are district §21.006 reports, DFPS cross-referrals, criminal-court notifications, and direct complaints from parents or students.
Intake is the administrative entry point. Most matters arrive through a superintendent's Texas Education Code §21.006 report; others come from the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services after a child-welfare investigation, from a criminal-court conviction notice, or from a direct citizen complaint.
At intake, the matter is logged and assigned an investigator. The educator does not always receive notice at this stage — the file may sit through screening before any contact letter goes out. Where the educator first learns of an investigation can depend on the source: a district matter typically surfaces during the district's internal process; a DFPS-source matter may surface only when TEA opens a file.
Phase 2 — Jurisdictional Screening
Section summaryTEA reviews whether the alleged conduct falls within SBEC's jurisdiction, whether the educator holds an active certificate, and whether the conduct (if proven) would warrant discipline under the Educator Code of Ethics or Texas Education Code §21.058.
Screening is not a merits determination. It is a triage step: does TEA have authority to act, does the complaint state a potential Educator Code of Ethics violation, and is the certificate active or recently active enough to support action?
Matters that pass screening proceed to formal investigation. Matters that fail screening are closed at intake — most often because the educator does not hold an SBEC certificate, the conduct does not fall within any Code provision, or the alleged conduct is outside SBEC's reach (for example, purely private personal-life conduct with no nexus to teaching).
Phase 3 — Formal Investigation
Section summaryThe formal-investigation phase is where TEA develops the evidentiary record: document requests to the district, witness interviews, review of personnel records, DFPS file review where applicable, and criminal-case records review.
Formal investigation can run from a few months to over a year. The work typically includes:
- Document requests to the employing district under §21.006 (personnel file, investigation report, witness statements, communications).
- Interview requests to fact witnesses (administrators, colleagues, students where appropriate, parents).
- Review of any DFPS investigation file and any cross-referenced criminal case.
- Request for an interview with the respondent educator (which the educator can decline pending counsel advice).
During this phase, the educator's exposure to discovery and the strategic value of a response are central considerations. Any statement the educator makes is evidence that can be used in the SBEC matter and (where applicable) in parallel criminal proceedings.
Phase 4 — Notice and Response
Section summaryWhen TEA concludes the investigation supports formal action, it issues a Notice of Alleged Violation identifying the Code provisions allegedly violated and the proposed discipline. The educator's written response is due in a defined window — typically 30 days.
The Notice of Alleged Violation is a pivotal procedural document. It identifies which Code of Ethics standards TEA believes were violated, summarizes the factual basis, and proposes a sanction (reprimand, suspension, revocation, surrender).
The educator's written response under 19 Tex. Admin. Code Chapter 249 is the first formal statement of the defense theory. It frames the issues, raises affirmative defenses, identifies witnesses, and signals whether the educator will accept an agreed order or proceed to contested case.
Missing the response deadline can produce a default-style posture in which the alleged facts are treated as admitted. Counsel involvement before any response is sent is the typical practice.
Phase 5 — ISC and Settlement
Section summaryThe Informal Settlement Conference is a structured negotiation between TEA staff and the educator (and counsel). Many cases resolve here via agreed order — typically reprimand, time-limited suspension, or surrender of certificate.
The ISC is the primary settlement off-ramp. TEA staff and the respondent (with counsel) discuss the evidence, the proposed sanction, and possible adjustments to the agreed order. The ISC outcome is non-binding until reduced to a written agreed order signed by the educator and the SBEC.
ISC is distinct from Mediated Settlement Conference (MSC), a separate procedure under 19 Tex. Admin. Code §249.40 that uses a neutral mediator. The two procedures serve overlapping but distinct strategic purposes.
Phase 6 — SOAH Contested Case
Section summaryIf no agreed resolution is reached, TEA files a formal complaint with the State Office of Administrative Hearings. SOAH conducts a contested-case hearing under the Administrative Procedure Act and issues a Proposal for Decision to the SBEC.
SOAH is the contested-case forum. An Administrative Law Judge presides; the rules of evidence apply (modified by APA); both sides present witnesses and exhibits; cross-examination is permitted. The ALJ issues a Proposal for Decision (PFD) containing findings of fact and conclusions of law and a recommended sanction.
SOAH proceedings can span several months from referral to PFD. Discovery is more formal than at the agency stage and the evidentiary record is the basis for the eventual SBEC Final Order.
Phase 7 — SBEC Final Order
Section summaryThe State Board for Educator Certification reviews the SOAH Proposal for Decision and issues a Final Order. The Final Order may adopt, modify, or reject the PFD. Judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act follows.
The SBEC convenes periodically to consider PFDs and issue Final Orders. The Final Order is the agency's definitive action — adopting, modifying, or rejecting the SOAH findings, conclusions, or recommended sanction.
Judicial review of a Final Order proceeds under the Texas Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code Chapter 2001, typically by petition for judicial review in a Travis County district court. Standard of review is substantial-evidence; reversal requires showing the agency's order is not supported by substantial evidence, exceeds statutory authority, or is otherwise affected by reversible legal error.
Need defense counsel?
L&L Law Group, PLLC handles Teacher License Defense cases throughout DFW. Initial consultations are free.
Call (972) 370-5060 →The SBEC investigation phases and the timeline framework
The SBEC investigation process proceeds through multiple distinct phases from initial complaint through final disposition. The phases include complaint intake and screening, formal investigation and evidence gathering, prosecution review and case preparation, contested hearing or negotiated disposition, and SBEC final action. Each phase has specific procedural requirements and timing considerations that the defense must understand to develop effective strategy.
The complaint intake phase typically lasts 30 to 60 days from receipt of the complaint. The SBEC reviews the complaint to determine whether it falls within SBEC jurisdiction and whether the allegations warrant formal investigation. Complaints that fail the initial review are dismissed without further action. Complaints that pass the initial review are assigned to investigators for formal investigation.
The formal investigation phase typically lasts 6 to 12 months for routine cases and substantially longer for complex cases. The investigation includes interviews with witnesses, review of school district records, review of educator certification records, examination of physical or documentary evidence, and consultation with experts where appropriate. The investigation produces an investigation report that the SBEC prosecutor uses to determine the disposition recommendation.
The prosecution review and the case preparation phase
The prosecution review phase follows the formal investigation and addresses the legal and strategic aspects of the case. The SBEC prosecutor reviews the investigation file, evaluates the legal sufficiency of the evidence, considers the applicable sanctions, and develops a disposition recommendation. The recommendation can range from dismissal of the case through various levels of negotiated disposition through preparation for contested hearing.
The case preparation activities during this phase include drafting of formal charges in cases proceeding to contested hearing, preparation of settlement offers in cases for which negotiated disposition is appropriate, and identification of witnesses and exhibits for the eventual proceeding. The prosecution preparation can extend several months for complex cases and may include retention of expert witnesses to support specific aspects of the case.
The defense engagement during the prosecution review phase can substantially affect the disposition outcome. The defense can present mitigating evidence, alternative interpretations of the investigation findings, and proposed dispositions that address the SBEC concerns while minimizing the educator long-term consequences. The defense advocacy at this stage often shapes the eventual disposition more substantially than advocacy at later stages.
The contested hearing phase and the SOAH timeline
Cases that proceed to contested hearing enter the SOAH timeline once formal charges are filed and the educator declines the proposed disposition. The SOAH proceeding includes discovery, prehearing motions, the contested hearing, post-hearing briefs, the ALJ proposal for decision, and exceptions to the proposal. The SOAH timeline typically extends 6 to 12 months from formal charges to final SBEC action.
The discovery period at SOAH typically allows 60 to 90 days for the parties to conduct discovery including document production, depositions, and other discovery devices. The prehearing motion practice can extend additional months depending on the specific motions filed and the complexity of the issues. The hearing itself typically occupies one to several days depending on the case complexity and the number of witnesses.
The post-hearing phase includes the ALJ preparation of the proposal for decision, the parties filing of exceptions, and the SBEC consideration of the proposal and exceptions. The SBEC final action typically follows within several months of the ALJ proposal. The defense engagement during the SOAH timeline includes substantial preparation, witness coordination, and tactical decisions about the case presentation.
Strategic considerations and the timeline management
The strategic considerations across the SBEC timeline include the timing of various defense interventions and the resource allocation across the multi-phase process. Early intervention during the investigation phase can substantially affect the SBEC factual record and can sometimes produce favorable disposition before formal charges are filed. Later intervention focuses on the SOAH proceeding and the specific evidentiary and procedural framework.
The educator employment status across the timeline affects strategic decisions. An educator who is placed on administrative leave during the SBEC investigation faces immediate financial pressure that affects the strategic calculus. An educator who is permitted to continue working has more flexibility but may face uncertainty about employment continuation as the case proceeds.
The timing of various dispositions can be negotiated to address specific educator concerns. A disposition that includes a delayed effective date can give the educator time to plan transitions. A disposition that includes specific protected periods can preserve the educator employment for defined periods. The defense should consider the timing dimensions of disposition options and should advocate for arrangements that maximize the educator practical interests across the SBEC timeline.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does an SBEC investigation typically take?
Do I have to participate in a TEA interview?
Can I keep teaching during the investigation?
What is the difference between an Informal Settlement Conference and a Mediated Settlement Conference?
Can I appeal an SBEC Final Order?
Read the full Texas Teacher License Defense Guide
This article is one section of our comprehensive Texas Teacher License Defense Guide. The pillar guide covers recent developments, official resources, and the complete framework with deeper analysis.
Read the Pillar Guide →Next Steps
If you are facing a situation described here, consult counsel promptly. Many issues in this area run on strict deadlines.
- Call (972) 370-5060
- Email info@landllawgroup.com
Cite this guide
Bluebook: Reggie London & Njeri London, SBEC Investigation Timeline — Phases & Deadlines, L&L Law Group (May 30, 2026), https://landllawgroup.com/insights/sbec-investigation-timeline-phases/.
APA: London, R., & London, N. (2026, May 30). SBEC Investigation Timeline — Phases & Deadlines. L&L Law Group.