Under Texas law, tricking someone into handing over the keys to a digital wallet and then draining it is treated as theft, because consent obtained by deception is not real consent, and cryptocurrency is treated as property that can be stolen. That question sits at the center of a sprawling federal case in which prosecutors say a young ringleader helped steal more than $240 million in Bitcoin from a single investor.

According to reporting on the federal case, Malone Lam, 22, originally from Singapore and arrested at a Miami mansion, is described by prosecutors as a suspected ringleader of a cryptocurrency-theft scheme, and co-conspirator Jeandiel Serrano allegedly created an exchange account holding nearly $30 million in stolen funds. Eighteen defendants have been charged and at least ten have pleaded guilty. Prosecutors describe a sophisticated social-engineering attack rather than a computer hack: in 2024, members of the group allegedly contacted a wealthy, longtime cryptocurrency investor while posing as representatives of Google and the Gemini exchange, warned him his accounts were compromised, and persuaded him to grant access and provide security codes. They then allegedly siphoned off more than 4,100 Bitcoin worth over $240 million, moved it through multiple exchanges, and spent millions on nightclubs and luxury goods. Because that conduct maps onto Texas statutes, L & L Law Group, PLLC explains how a defendant in Frisco or the wider DFW area would face these allegations. The charges are only accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Is Stealing Cryptocurrency a Crime in Texas?

Yes, stealing cryptocurrency is a crime in Texas, and it is prosecuted as theft. The Texas Penal Code defines property broadly to include anything of value, and Texas has amended its laws to recognize virtual currency, so Bitcoin and similar assets are treated as property that a person can unlawfully appropriate. What matters is not the digital form of the asset but whether the defendant took control of something of value belonging to another without effective consent. In plain terms, the fact that the loot was Bitcoin rather than cash does not take the conduct outside Texas theft law.

How Does Deception Turn a Transfer Into Theft?

Deception turns a seemingly voluntary transfer into theft because Texas law says consent is not effective when it is induced by deception or coercion. Under Section 31.03 of the Penal Code, a person commits theft by unlawfully appropriating property with intent to deprive the owner of it, and appropriation is unlawful when it is without the owner's effective consent. When someone is tricked into revealing security codes or granting account access by a caller pretending to be tech support or an exchange, any consent given is legally void, and the resulting transfer of the cryptocurrency is treated as a taking. The impersonation is what converts what looks like the victim's own action into a crime by the person who deceived him.

What Other Texas Charges Could Apply?

Beyond theft, a Texas prosecutor would likely add fraudulent use or possession of identifying information under Section 32.51, which reaches the misuse of another person's access credentials and account information without consent. Breach of computer security under Section 33.02 can apply where a defendant knowingly accesses a computer, network, or system without the owner's effective consent to carry out the scheme. Where the proceeds are moved through exchanges and converted to cash to disguise their origin, money-laundering exposure under Section 34.02 can follow, and the theft amounts can be aggregated under Section 31.09 into a single high-value felony.

What Penalties Would a Frisco Defendant Face?

The exposure in a Texas courtroom would be severe. Theft is graded by the value of what is taken, and a case involving property worth $300,000 or more is a first-degree felony punishable by five to 99 years or life in prison and a fine up to $10,000. A defendant in the Frisco area, in Collin County, could see theft, identity-information, computer-security, and money-laundering counts charged together, with restitution to the victim a central issue. Texas courts treat a planned, multi-participant scheme that targets a specific victim for a very large sum as a serious aggravating factor at sentencing.

What Defenses Might Apply in a Texas Case?

A strong defense begins with intent and role, because theft requires proof that the defendant intended to deprive the owner of the property and knew the consent was obtained by deception. Defense counsel would examine whether a particular defendant knew the funds were stolen or believed he was performing a legitimate service, how the loss and each person's share were calculated, and whether the state can trace specific conduct to a specific defendant across a large group. Challenges to the valuation of the cryptocurrency at the relevant time, to aggregation, and to the reliability of blockchain tracing can all narrow exposure or support a negotiated resolution.

How L&L Law Group Can Help

Cryptocurrency-theft cases involve fast-moving digital evidence, blockchain tracing, and difficult questions about intent, valuation, and each person's role, which makes early legal guidance essential. L & L Law Group, PLLC represents clients across Frisco and the DFW area in theft, identity, computer-crime, and white-collar matters, working to test how the state traces and values digital assets, challenge inflated loss calculations, and protect a client's rights at every stage. If you or someone you know is facing an investigation or charges involving cryptocurrency, account access, or online impersonation, contact L & L Law Group, PLLC to discuss your options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bitcoin considered property under Texas theft law? Yes. The Texas Penal Code defines property broadly to include anything of value, and Texas law recognizes virtual currency, so cryptocurrency can be the subject of a theft charge.

Is it still theft if the victim handed over access voluntarily? Often yes. Under Section 31.03, consent is not effective when it is induced by deception, so tricking a victim into granting access can still be an unlawful appropriation.

Can losses across a large group scheme be combined? Yes. Under Section 31.09, amounts obtained through a continuing course of conduct can be aggregated, which can raise the offense to a single first-degree felony when the total is large.

Available 24/7 · (972) 370-5060

Talk to a real attorney

Send a few details and a defense attorney will reach back within an hour, day or night. No call center. No paralegal screen.

24/7 availability — day, night, weekends, holidays. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.